From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F5521F28A for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 17:51:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hi2so3200075wib.11 for ; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:51:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1ZEZRk7oLhqqbXkkIuy8gHGxPjvuGUr0LvqQCKOFd5E=; b=KxiipmksfbJ0b4yCTX50/h06w/EGQC6Lkoi+au8T8DPEFzJeiTjV03BCWn75fhx7rn wVPle/Vnkgay8xz/TcJlWpsLWmEyPGqydi94ZQoGz4oqC3OQlWpE48pnEwc5s8kJG9Yq 7tJdWAk++vmTvqav1OnuEFRnV0clNWqzE4KisWhHpcvZkAzHeWP9G2VPwoPi0uYfwmnh 05XPcDGdTTNcscaI1m8Cr2GUGST0CMwcKEaquHSguRbuYSMspEOLzLULxsoyS2dIkiGN aW8GWMPNMHKI4KWOgupdzxX/v7clYo/0+QQ38pZ6iR9qGK+7QdBPjD3LNvQGXOEyEFpi uykg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.201.73 with SMTP id jy9mr31343675wjc.51.1396745503646; Sat, 05 Apr 2014 17:51:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 17:51:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140406000236.GM9694@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> References: <20140406000236.GM9694@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2014 17:51:43 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.36-1 dev build released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 00:51:46 -0000 On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Here are some betterspeedtest.sh results for 3.10.36-1: > > First, without SQM enabled: > > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh > Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 s= econds in each direction) > ............................................................ > Download: 52.39 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 15.281 > 10pct: 18.302 > Median: 28.502 > Avg: 32.891 > 90pct: 56.776 > Max: 74.282 > ............................................................. > Upload: 11.07 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 15.341 > 10pct: 18.669 > Median: 82.480 > Avg: 126.662 > 90pct: 248.102 > Max: 278.644 > > And now, with SQM set to 80% up/down numbers from above: > > root@cerowrt:~# sh betterspeedtest.sh > Testing against netperf.richb-hanover.com while pinging gstatic.com (60 s= econds in each direction) > ............................................................ > Download: 32.84 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 15.623 > 10pct: 16.077 > Median: 17.634 > Avg: 17.982 > 90pct: 19.653 > Max: 23.272 > ............................................................. > Upload: 8.25 Mbps > Latency: (in msec, 61 pings, 0.00% packet loss) > Min: 16.001 > 10pct: 17.623 > Median: 19.796 > Avg: 19.820 > 90pct: 21.716 > Max: 23.228 > root@cerowrt:~# I think we are establishing that you can set downloads to above the measured value at above 22mbit. Please try again with download 60000, and pick another number for uploads higher than 80%. > > > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:18:51PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: >> + openwrt merge >> ++ fix for dhcpv6 renew problem >> + actually tested for an hour so far on 5.4ghz, with a us countrycode >> and wpa+psk enabled... >> >> Get it at: >> >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.36-1/ >> >> but: there isn't much other reason to upgrade to this... >> >> - no progress on the wifi bug - but I am beating up wifi with a variety = of >> devices and scripts today hoping to make it fail, and bringing up a >> bunch more tomorrow. >> >> - toke's script relies on stratum '16' changing, and it doesn't with ope= nwrt's >> ntp, it seems.... > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html