Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: dpreed@reed.com
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford talk/deluged in hardware/yurtlab
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 10:39:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5j7QGoASyTXwNs=XOYbRgfBegiiyEarws04dTpYXUSAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359915996.128612322@apps.rackspace.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3113 bytes --]

On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:26 AM, <dpreed@reed.com> wrote:

> It would be trivial to do this with a Zedboard.
>

Well, need two network ports. Haven't figured out much on interfacing the
thing to offboard gear (I'd have liked it if it had a pci interface). So is
interfacing up a second network card "trivial" on the I/Os provided?

And wanted esata, or some high speed disk I/O interface for captures.

I'd rather like to continue forward on the zedboard front. The prospect of
designing an ethernet chip that actually could incorporate fq_codel etc is
very exciting. The RGII interface is available to access directly, in
particular.





>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 3, 2013 1:17pm
> To: "Mark Constable" <markc@renta.net>
> Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] stanford talk/deluged in hardware/yurtlab
>
>  Well, I see it for 320. Then you need to add a SSD, and a decent network
> card, and I suppose it could be made to work. Awful big, tho, in an era
> where I can get 1/2TB on an 2.5 inch SSD.
>
> What I'd wanted was closer to a dreamplug - 160 bucks, two network ports,
> but with an internal SSD. bonus points if it fit into a 1U rack and ate as
> little power as possible.
>
> Principal use case here is to be a "network monitor" with enough oomph to
> run stuff like cacti/mrtg/snmp tools, as well as do captures off of a
> mirrored switch port.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>  On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mark Constable <markc@renta.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2013-02-03 09:18am, Dave Taht wrote:
>>> > I'm grumpy, as it doesn't have an esata interface internally,
>>> apparently.
>>>
>>> https://www.google.com?q=HP+N40L+MicroServer
>>>
>>> I know this is no where near an embedded device but I just got one of
>>> these
>>> on sale (new model out) for $220 and I think it's the most useful
>>> all-round
>>> cheap server box I've ever seen. Some people have it running 16 GB ram
>>> and
>>> I've got mine booting off an SSD via external eSATA. Very well built
>>> with 2
>>> x half height PCI slots (4 x eth port card?). Only missing USB3 ports and
>>> hot-swap drive space. And, very quiet with just an SSD.
>>>
>>
>> I'd be very interested to know how fast it could do packet header
>> captures.
>>
>> Line rate (gigE) would be good.
>>
>> Does it do BQL? (what is the onboard ethernet chips)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>>
>> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
>> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
>



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt:
http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5103 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-03 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-03 17:18 Dave Taht
2013-02-03 18:03 ` Mark Constable
2013-02-03 18:10   ` Dave Taht
2013-02-03 18:17     ` Dave Taht
2013-02-03 18:26       ` dpreed
2013-02-03 18:39         ` Dave Taht [this message]
2013-02-04  1:11           ` dpreed
2013-02-04  1:47             ` Dave Taht
2013-02-04 16:41               ` dpreed
2013-02-04  6:09       ` Mark Constable
2013-02-04  6:29         ` Dave Taht
2013-02-04 10:07           ` Mark Constable
2013-02-03 18:24     ` Maciej Soltysiak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw5j7QGoASyTXwNs=XOYbRgfBegiiyEarws04dTpYXUSAQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dpreed@reed.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox