From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3542A21F7F8 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:43:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obpn3 with SMTP id n3so70314910obp.0 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:43:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bGifRzHJhoNX2Kjut3vTOAd5T/mRBF862X88jHaNIkk=; b=GH6KvzXFAOHetJIt7DCdIdELkZrS7rBSaeSD5A+XaE4RcxGCqxGp5wETSGaJBMXf7C EhMRMBWwC1dxR+NLSTXYQdFtIVNn5f/SnnLOM5NhUbrl8qNOWrbEFXxG3lMuOoa5hi2f PmOh5UdwOUrOeaGg/V5Y8XMALAz1jhFYYaKYfItDvAimt0BzviZOzYKuDi/mjtDgXI9Q h09kSMcanH2m2UKaiRlciaTCD5EcPCZ51SDP20U9+dvb/Q+OSriJiclhYP31ESOigdf2 Elrstoai8S3aItf/Vooqg9CicDKk+MrhtE2VHuKGwLJW4FJv/ndnVRhKwfNohQ4RBRLt YKBg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.246.9 with SMTP id xs9mr44657277obc.45.1435336992788; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.129 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:43:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <55847E32.9000405@gmail.com> <5584823E.4040207@gmail.com> <0129B5FB-9D1B-45FF-84CA-492A6A0B638B@gmx.de> <43D5C3CE-F1F4-4BA5-AEB9-55348661C7BA@gmx.de> <50067716-7437-40C5-BF97-8AF7668F5967@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 09:43:12 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Mikael Abrahamsson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:43:42 -0000 On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrot= e: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Sebastian Moeller wrote: > >> Tangent: What is the shaper rate the wdr4900 can push with >> sqm-scripts? (Before your 1200ac results the ppc-soc in the wdr4900 look= ed >> like the finest little router platform in the last years, too bad it was >> ignored by the mass market...) > > > Well, if I set SQM to 500 megabit/s and MSS to 300 I am able to get 70 > megabit/s of iperf3 through it at 42k PPS. At default MSS I get 150 > megabit/s at 25k PPS through it. This is at 100% sirq. > > Does this help, or do you want me to do any other tests. I have the WDR49= 00 > powered up and on my desk right now. I am never allergic to somene running a comprehensive flent suite through something, and sticking the results up somewhere. :) There are always more surprises and more things we seem to have to wackamol= e. > > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast