From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118F021F1C7 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:16:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id y10so3722953wgg.0 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:16:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=USgK3N1qPfrH0iBM1zuUibo80Vnru9Y9x6bNi78M/do=; b=XD86BL1fuMDKOZkLn2pMSD5/9yV5VSdiFfcEzJgCKsusKqtX4GoaJOWb75YFQ1+svv GKZHUs9y0ZUrC6FpdQfWVRSIwZ/6i9XoSSa0uXNzOpCAPBtoO/cyylwvsWTWurikBWVE ZN3QLdMfNKuAqwFFt5rfQeF03G6XgiJCJmxx4U+Dzf+3m7r6VHgFW286lJZeRUDgm9Ff gpHJdu1MiytYphFfjctaVAbTxM9yCTDzPJpLJ5yjRrFo+n3Yk9FJ2p8A9FaLjGGtk7J8 +fGnT3YbiTgo4MT66fbs654U1ZZgU8QOL78aafvhMZBIEoImA8wts7EMaazkMTlOpfCw LnnA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.77.44 with SMTP id p12mr61190wjw.94.1387131405780; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.123.69 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:16:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <472E1EFA-1D6E-460B-AB2E-6E55D63184AD@gmail.com> References: <472E1EFA-1D6E-460B-AB2E-6E55D63184AD@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 10:16:45 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Rich Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Field Report on CeroWrt 3.10.24-1 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:16:48 -0000 On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Rich Brown wrote= : > I did a tftp install of CeroWrt 3.10.42-1 on my secondary WNDR3800. I the= n used the =93secondary=94 script to reconfigure the subnets and SSIDs to b= e different from my primary CeroWrt router. I know that a lot of things are= still in flux, but I thought I should comment that I noticed the following= : > > 0) It seems to work mostly. I could connect my MacBook on Ethernet, but n= ot wireless (see below) I ran RRUL with reasonable results (I think) > > 1) Only the ge00 interface was in its proper firewall zone (wan); I used = the GUI to move all the gwxx to guest and se00 and swxx interfaces to lan. We are using the + syntax to put stuff in their proper zones. It's faster, but doesn't show up in the guy properly. E.g. s+ is the secure zone (1 firewall rule instead of 3) and gw+ is the guest zone (1 firewall rule instead of 4) I don't know how to represent this properly in the gui. > 2) None of the wireless SSIDs (2.4 or 5 GHz) allowed connections. It appe= ars that they=92re there, my MacBook sees them, but it cannot get an addres= s for itself on those SSIDs. > > 3) Clicking the AQM tab gave the following diagnostic info: > > /usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:448: Failed to execute cbi dispatcher ta= rget for entry '/admin/network/aqm'. > The called action terminated with an exception: > /usr/lib/lua/luci/model/cbi/aqm.lua:63: attempt to index global 'sc' (a n= il value) > stack traceback: > [C]: in function 'assert' > /usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:448: in function 'dispatch' > /usr/lib/lua/luci/dispatcher.lua:195: in function Fixed in git head > 3a) To work around this (as noted in another message on the list), remove= leading =93s=94 of line 63 of /usr/lib/lua/luci/model/cbi/aqm.lua to read: > > c:depends("advanced", "1=94) > > 4) In the AQM tab, I=92m not sure which linklayer adaptation mechanism to= use. It would be good to have a concise summary of the proper settings for= various use cases. (And to install a set of defaults that will =93do the r= ight thing=94 for the majority of people, so we don=92t have to explain it = very often.) I agree that that page is puzzling as hell, and needs a pointer to what sorts of DSL services require it. > 5) I did *not* try the Hurricane Electric 6in4 tunnel. as a secondary router it would be better to assign it addresses on your existing /48 > Best regards, > > Rich Brown > Hanover, NH > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html