From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83F7621F263 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oigv203 with SMTP id v203so130023158oig.3 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:18:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UoscUxVMMEkNA3Kg2QX7H2IBEWotf+sPbYabyzDXLI0=; b=SSRrVy8TH3XL2gjFA6KWN32r6DcaWFX4W4zmo0qkyHqtFCnIOWcU7SmUee387UbO5l S8YRJdNqyUIy9mWlnd0wQr71vM2Czfil20vSvMcilB3vzMQ0MjYblvK+OGKgti5ZyKGU 7YULP6lU1czsuM6LAcQa3ZxWYjHeRwOSu2OqkG37/P4P5y41E0Cs+GWgmYwsDbMVwfGl u32RnsmfxDlQcJC2Vce64ykn5eitkzhnHb8pQnTLe9/d2TYE/VwR/XBDfYTZgqDbiRSj QdhfrWeCopH5E94sL1a8dDZkZlMDUAR7mQw/ZTG4ODwTlh8/AoLlXAMHhyS9KwkQU5y2 15fw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.77.38 with SMTP id p6mr1885848oew.75.1427077138589; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:18:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <08BAF198-87C5-42B8-8899-53F34E47156E@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 19:18:58 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jonathan Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] archer c7 v2, policing, hostapd, test openwrt build X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 02:19:27 -0000 On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Jonathan Morton = wrote: >> >>> On 23 Mar, 2015, at 03:45, David Lang wrote: >>> >>> are we running into performance issues with fq_codel? I thought all the= problems were with HTB or ingress shaping. >> >> Cake is, in part, a response to the HTB problem; it is a few percent mor= e efficient so far than an equivalent HTB+fq_codel combination. It will ha= ve a few other novel features, too. And we have a much more efficient version of codel, which may help a bit also. Still, really need to get back to profiling *the entire path* on these itty bitty platforms. Look forward to getting the FIB patches working on them, but that's a hairy lot of patches to backport. Might be easier wasn't really planning on making chaos calmer's freeze >> Bobbie is a response to the ingress-shaping problem. A policer (with no= queue) can be run without involving an IFB device, which we believe has a = large overhead. > > yep. > > 3rd option is to go make better hardware. Not getting very far on this > https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-ha= rdware-for-networking > > going to have to try harder. Honestly had hoped that broadcom, qca, > cisco, or somebody making chips would have got it right by now. > >> - Jonathan Morton >> > > > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb