From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 734A121F1BC for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:44:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t60so3680861wes.34 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:44:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=F9DxzGLTnvILah1s/1LtBo8OG9N2QUvL0faI/x1/QaE=; b=rE/Rr8hxmSaP0/QmSi7nc62+wuFGM1A1wZ4FTsy6bprmyWuVwk0T9T+FD7hEeOWBIR dFNJyr/KPB7vufeiSkvEAu+V837XsC9xSkGTK/rWm59BKdEspg4xxA3djBTWrH01ku2o hdvyPyqbl4GQQ15LYmsa8zgX3Umr6S6NNOrRGSeqVXXM5XxD2J3Q9pLAXYgVzD+iU8la 0J6qYgrA4H3e7mJw+7Fqul7lSafRlv0xySEcPq73yKf50VUn4jHDFKO9+lu3RTZdfI/m Vjzqv5PuM3xiGapYgr7xrKLuc9hXesaPwSAtGiUcD171SXDhp3wd3x81+Ae7pqeM3yQn eCPw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.78.210 with SMTP id d18mr12026482wjx.27.1387647873263; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:44:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.123.69 with HTTP; Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:44:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:44:33 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jim Reisert AD1C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] IPV6 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:44:35 -0000 No, you did not managed to get ipv6 addrs assigned on even the gateway. How you got an addr assigned for ipv6 dns is puzzling. grump. Well, something broke between last feburary (when this worked in comcast's lab), and today (deployment). I am trying to get ipv6 at a location here in california that ostensibly supports it... (but oy, do I not want to talk about the disaster I had with customer service yesterday trying to get bridge mode to work and also saw no sign of an ipv6 address assignment. I want to maintain the holiday spirit) But we'll get there. Merely getting to comcast6.net is not a good test. That is on both ipv4 and ipv6. On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> The gui is broken on seeing the wan port. It does look like you got >> dns via ipv6. >> >> do an >> >> ip -6 addr show > > 2: se00: mtu 1500 qlen 1000 > inet6 fe80::100d:7fff:fe64:c60c/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > 3: ge00: mtu 1500 qlen 1000 > inet6 fe80::120d:7fff:fe64:c60d/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > >> if you do see ipv6 addrs, hopefully dnsmasq is doing ipv6 dns queries >> at the very least. Try also a ping6 of a ipv6 enabled website. > > root@cerowrt:~# ping comcast6.net > PING comcast6.net (69.252.216.215): 56 data bytes > --- comcast6.net ping statistics --- > 6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > I can get to http://comcast6.net however. > > > -- > Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html