From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Wes Felter <wmf@felter.org>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 10GigE nics and SFP+ modules?
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:14:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5tPjBFJ-Fi1FxzbGubCe6BB2Vj-yRRUrKSwD8hza8RTg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lunj4c$i3u$1@ger.gmane.org>
In this space also is:
http://linuxgizmos.com/quad-core-cortex-a15-soc-features-6mb-on-chip-ram/
I like that TI has also (finally) adopted an upstream-first kernel
policy. It is,
of course, unclear how their offloads work.
On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Wes Felter <wmf@felter.org> wrote:
> On 9/8/14, 11:06 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
>
>> I encourage you strongly to look to using Optical LX style fibre if
>> you are moving to 10G. The cost of structured cabling and the length
>> of runs is a lot cheaper than Cat6a/7 runs needed for 10gbit copper.
>
>
> Twinax is cheaper than optical or base-T.
>
>
> --
> Wes Felter
> IBM Research - Austin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
--
Dave Täht
https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-10 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-06 18:36 Dave Taht
2014-09-06 19:05 ` dpreed
2014-09-06 20:44 ` Dave Taht
2014-09-09 0:09 ` Wes Felter
2014-09-09 4:03 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2014-09-09 4:06 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2014-09-09 16:26 ` dpreed
2014-09-09 16:54 ` Dave Taht
2014-09-10 7:01 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-09-09 19:06 ` Wes Felter
2014-09-10 1:14 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2014-09-10 6:43 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2014-09-10 18:05 Dave Taht
2014-09-10 18:09 ` Nicholas Weaver
2014-09-10 19:31 ` dpreed
2014-09-11 15:30 ` Dave Taht
2014-09-13 2:48 ` Chuck Anderson
2014-09-10 20:03 ` Michael Richardson
2014-09-10 21:54 ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw5tPjBFJ-Fi1FxzbGubCe6BB2Vj-yRRUrKSwD8hza8RTg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=wmf@felter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox