From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F39621F2D2 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id uz6so12681371obc.38 for ; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:14:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/nP5baPV/J+e2r7QFjB4CgGqEQjGvQcqZNmfFoAhN6A=; b=V05OfsosNbZjMpw/XGOFfrk5MMw6ti+/T7pBwfRh2ywYx22IDUQ8fYgvmj7TwsyQ7z ncFmbrU+rWtrIDN5h78bKh+zUTREyPnfsYLiwX3voAsGDbW7ChGUo20T4kfliLUUiA7z IWdG7YLhiwGGg3hYZl1cg2Xu94mm35BI4XfwU74mPIELhC/hR8Pf15jsnaPILzo0zHb0 4x/agt2N6Wrl1QKaDSQLQ67TmwumJqiiX3IbCJeV8SOElV6ZYq5Qb9qxDYsyW2oUZFBg 9y+NiMbStZX0VTfyixeV4K8zcRmiZ+rxlh60A7AgGKu1BFJgCbHJg/04W7M96vmNJvTy OEAw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.65.35 with SMTP id u3mr44264410oes.35.1410311670710; Tue, 09 Sep 2014 18:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.227.76 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:14:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:14:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Wes Felter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 10GigE nics and SFP+ modules? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 01:15:00 -0000 In this space also is: http://linuxgizmos.com/quad-core-cortex-a15-soc-features-6mb-on-chip-ram/ I like that TI has also (finally) adopted an upstream-first kernel policy. It is, of course, unclear how their offloads work. On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Wes Felter wrote: > On 9/8/14, 11:06 PM, Joel Wir=C4=81mu Pauling wrote: > >> I encourage you strongly to look to using Optical LX style fibre if >> you are moving to 10G. The cost of structured cabling and the length >> of runs is a lot cheaper than Cat6a/7 runs needed for 10gbit copper. > > > Twinax is cheaper than optical or base-T. > > > -- > Wes Felter > IBM Research - Austin > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/make-wifi-fast