From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22c.google.com (mail-oi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22B421F2C3 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:51:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oifl3 with SMTP id l3so15863017oif.0 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:51:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fqnUhYsw6odL87RVK98ps2M1IyCsHcEBGQ3mPF/0nHQ=; b=Bn0RJSo8rUmPzlGOV8pu/3m43B2u+qF6CXvxVIq+gFz6jiz2owfVYLNCLIx4D3WtUj vkl58mEz15amSeaJVRl77n+1ctbRv2B+O8LWX66m3lpgvUcUvbT3p34m3f+maRORsnv7 Ohuy1PvnzVrc0BQQuK8x+CHUeCRWq1tAmKzH/RQa/hawlEyJGiUEcPNvNhQChG92CW6u GF8uXRuoyUwed9V5lq+ubVxJA38SpKiA/YhzORGJor79PbEFYVnOAoTEnVefp1i/vmEq UDd96nQXftKMdgXsDzfPiJrLKbNbvguUx0f0CfyZjg7eASWtqJtFtfJY4A/r7LizkcQE Hypw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.175.76 with SMTP id y73mr33101880oie.81.1426708302829; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:51:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:51:42 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ce60c96a024051195696b Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] more hope for wifi X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:52:12 -0000 --001a113ce60c96a024051195696b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://www.gizmag.com/full-duplex-wireless-radio-integrated-circuit/36580/ yes, stanford. things are looking up.... On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > http://www.engineering.columbia.edu/new-technology-may-double-radio-frequ= ency-data-capacity-0 > > (also being discussed on slashdot) > > I think there was some other full duplex technology developed at stanford > discussed about 6 months back? > > -- > Dave T=C3=A4ht > Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb --001a113ce60c96a024051195696b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@= gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.engineering.columbia.edu/new-technology-may-double-radio-freque= ncy-data-capacity-0

(also being discussed on slashdo= t)

I think there was some other full duplex techno= logy developed at stanford discussed about 6 months back?

--
Dave T=C3=A4ht<= br>Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!

https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TV= X3o84jjmb



--
Dave T=C3=A4ht
Let's make wifi fast, less jitte= ry and reliable again!

https://plus.google.co= m/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
--001a113ce60c96a024051195696b--