From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0378321F0B0 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:13:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w62so5000761wes.7 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:13:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f8gGUG1/svf123fy+EM0gDAzGnIijLFHiyw7flMITUU=; b=xC7vBd1ubgbWgE/fOcLDaNGCC+SPXcSeQAdFre0z4+Pp5o9HTQB9YwZudPzFMmXKcU +lbLRB8fK1YBPfts4Wk8SkyXYilUicQ5NcZwWA1N2hiCRSIqxJvjc0fWrF8Koep5hKPV paS5tY6UAdsEmknoCyERcaRq7WbcozTbpAmNHC/3HIA5PDykerXgCLw3+r3FbN0BeAya WHSbKeL4GI5mnSmgj0Y0RjQtsnfN/U5zgV/isMKJEZxp9iwYRR0aGxnIj9fI0ykUmmgT pxCs7blLW9Ixx5XUw6UQzM9KsRLlnSYm/0QO1yxvM6c335gBMF86QtJBrKHk534BnUot qCMA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.184.14 with SMTP id eq14mr13555898wic.56.1384200833286; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:13:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.51.5 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:13:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <11578.1384198837@sandelman.ca> References: <11578.1384198837@sandelman.ca> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:13:53 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Michael Richardson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] running cerowrt/*wrt in a VM X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:13:56 -0000 I have had multiple requests for an x86 vm. I tried several times but never got anything that even booted. And ENOBUDGET to make it work, and ENOTIME to keep it working. I do take patches, and all that is really needed for a cerowrt build would be a new build script, .config file, and a working filesystem. I'd argue for straight openwrt and/or see if you can leverage a trunk build. Everything you describe has made it to openwrt "barrier breaker" trunk already. On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Michael Richardson wro= te: > > I need to do some testing of PPPoE, DHCPv6 (RFC6204/homenet) with an > OpenWRT/CeroWRT. > > I want to do this virtually, so an x86 build would be best. I grabbed the= kvm > image of openwrt attitude adjustment, as per: > http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/howto/qemu > and > http://downloads.openwrt.org/attitude_adjustment/12.09/ > > it appears that it hasn't got any IPv6 stuff in it. I thought that all t= his > stuff from openwrt went upstream? Is 12.09 perhaps just too old? > > My choices are, I guess: > 1) build cerowrt for x86 > 2) build latest openwrt from source > > Or did I miss an obvious image? > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh netwo= rks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network archite= ct [ > ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails= [ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html