From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ia0-f170.google.com (mail-ia0-f170.google.com [209.85.210.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FFDB21F0AE for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:19:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ia0-f170.google.com with SMTP id i1so9098558iaa.1 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:19:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2/5uE/nOrosauGkpVrqtfQhVuTHklfkfkqzbcZ0MgW8=; b=NpSCnEsakaiHqJrOwfTgksnfPJ8mR6fo81qtVttXgInEQJ2BumRqAkXyq2VFg6JKRJ XI8OTPiYy2lxHsybgEFYvKtovoAz+DP+0OreWE2y9O8oFPqfgXE6fQa6mTc1WfEveAY2 XFxhyg5fTxCMwxm3+UN0wkVGdoq4nJB27llMgX91TqSV2ont6W7anYGPxK/iBwFX3Cd3 16MkmvrzjsTwCN2RITlk9T+QiIK3VUhvJQltRlFK02tj3+S/GJj8Yl3856d71ndkiTP+ WCGbtyY9wP1xusJzi3t86Q8hvNONqWRG3g0VIMjwAYDuuuuV2YYOwZ5JSwcSLycjyi1s uBfg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.88.136 with SMTP id bg8mr25725896igb.96.1356725986211; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:19:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.135.39 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 12:19:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50DDDD58.9090901@openwrt.org> References: <50DDDD58.9090901@openwrt.org> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 15:19:46 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Steven Barth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Latest IPv6 Updates X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:19:47 -0000 On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Steven Barth wrote: > Hi guys, > > the following updates / changes for IPv6 have been commited to OpenWrt in > the last days. Most of these affect RFC 6204 CE-compliance, some are > convenience changes. > > Feel free to merge and test CeroWrt. I have merged with openwrt head, and updated to dnsmasq 2.66test4, and also folded in the tiny luci upnp fix to the '&' issue. I'm not really sure if that last is the right thing, it's supposed to be translated... http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.6.11-4/ I am still not in a position to test anything cerowrt related myself right now, although I am down to a mere 20 miles between me and the yurtlab and 50 from isc. I am relieved to hear that amazon claims they will get new supplies of the wndr3800 by jan 5. I am staring at the bunch of hardware I ordered in something of a panic - dreamplug, wndr4300, the nanostations, a couple bus pirates, a nexus 7, and trying to figure out a direction to move forward that makes sense. > * Detect and delegate IPv6-specific MTU from upstream interfaces (e.g. > tunnels, pppoe, etc.) and propagate them to downstream interfaces > (supporting cases where IPv4-MTU and IPv6-MTU differ, e.g. 6in4, 6rd, 6to= 4, > ...) Excellent! PPPoE? > * Add a default null-route for delegated prefixes (CE-requirement WPD-6) > This fixes routing loops in case packets with a destination within an unu= sed > / unassigned part of a delegated prefix are received. > > * Added support for site-borders (interfaces which ULA-traffic might not > cross) as specified in CE-requirement ULA-4 > > * Added support to override CE-requirement ULA-5 for NPT-setups (iirc not > relevant if dnsmasq is used, as it does not follow ULA-5). > > > Documentation on http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 has been update= d. > > > > Btw. Simon Kelley released 2.66-test4 which fixes some bugs related to > stateful DHCPv6 and should make it usable finally. Also the new > MTU-propagation mentioned above is now supported by dnsmasq as well. > I haven't tested it myself yet but you can try if you are brave. I folded in the same patches as were used in 2.66-test3. A good default configuration for cero would be good, Not sure what that is.= .. > > I will try to make a table about the RFC requirements for Customer Edge > (CE)-Routers soon which sums up which requirements are fulfilled and whic= h > are still not implemented both for CeroWrt / OpenWrt with 6relayd and wit= h > dnsmasq as RA/DHCPv6-server. > > > Cheers, > > Steven > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html