From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD0CB21F846 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:58:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obctg8 with SMTP id tg8so72508879obc.3 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:58:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZD/ARrnMyM/U+eYa0el4FsE4EUlwwQwpItCFN6EGA58=; b=kSqpoXMe8ci+otxWbqQS0OPdOcdtZn7cgOzshTdqpsRclY93uAwkgEIx61Qf88Ewh/ mXXSWpxJJBg21iXc1kLB5K1zjFgT0MWZF9f/xw+6hhCjrJivjhiHMNNMRtSyBusBA7iI WFU4jwTa7tjj41aWT7GQcZ0RZ0NpXfhFYHquxXc/5LyDzu8uG3dubGJgJUsz/sG0ikrn A73KoO6X0kkAVSQw8vAV9X7J2eGgt6Fuzzjbg+bDfLjwfmQl8TtNUqJXJvfbXLEa9II5 lHyMTdzKtgkSGlTrDaIwmWej4Q9/WQGSESkvSBItscdAu9sq1ly80coEqhwM8KQs3KB1 rkzg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.91.212 with SMTP id p203mr2638342oib.108.1435345120363; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.129 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:58:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <0129B5FB-9D1B-45FF-84CA-492A6A0B638B@gmx.de> <43D5C3CE-F1F4-4BA5-AEB9-55348661C7BA@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:58:40 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Mikael Abrahamsson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 18:59:10 -0000 On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wro= te: > On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Dave Taht wrote: > >> Mikael, a simple test of the analysis I just did would be to use >> ethtool to set your server to 100mbits (ethtool -s >> your_ethernet_device advertise 0x008 and turn on fq_codel on both the >> client and server. > > > Hm what do you mean by "client" and "server"? > > Where do you want the queueing to happen? Egress from the WRT1200AC towar= ds > the server? Yes. > Then setting the WAN port of the WRT1200AC to 100 megabit/s > would work, yes. Yes, but I am unsure from looking at the driver that using ethtool on the egress on the wrt1200ac will actually work, but pretty sure it will work if you set it on the server. feel free to try both= . :) > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast