From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oa0-x22e.google.com (mail-oa0-x22e.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22e])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53AB821F1F7
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m1so10785238oag.19
	for <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>;
	Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=rcPMm7yBsPdg04NdUiOHvIb0vTvcnyiwUHPmb566mpk=;
	b=AnRbKTvssbrWprDvX5rptNdiilAuOiXJsDnHnTwsxsnPFO9GJPKK7BuCQVIBRkhxF4
	ETuUGKiVkKYqHjTJjv2jSuxZmWp9YWGxJpbbgP/+Ifa5lQdD3YqgozTtfjWETWxqCqAh
	IcT3uBYr2Ip9Kbj2QytM13LHRn9fv4H/SXSQWVIvPJHe1LXGj9Vny9jB9h5YzHgVTS3q
	BjE5cmU8G0i1traWH0D3zuNzzaZgMLNGNGDHsQxvtDGMJooonX+kB1ptSVPzFAWd9D66
	h/ZG3qx54A+VLCGLsPSGiTu19f6IadnL9FbRYl1tBJEKMBLokqVhwjrlyr1pRKTyBZr2
	RNJg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.200.169 with SMTP id jt9mr23422471obc.0.1403557080174;
	Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.48.200 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:58:00 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw62CSAyQf3TTSy4mb=TpgYrq-JjD_E4DmXWx8aORikMuA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 first hop security discussed
X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
	<cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/cerowrt-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>,
	<mailto:cerowrt-devel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 20:58:01 -0000

http://blog.ipspace.net/2014/06/why-is-ipv6-layer-2-security-so-complex.htm=
l

author fails to note that l2 switching is way cheaper and faster than
routing with the dedicated silicon we have today.

But it needent' have been.
--=20
Dave T=C3=A4ht

NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_=
indecent.article