Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Erkki Lintunen <ebirdie@iki.fi>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] an option for a new platform?
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 06:52:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw63tNVYanzYHkUxST2pr=x6ZsCJWcabgpLibA10iCk85g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <548A9A66.1040002@iki.fi>

There was a review of that hardware that showed it couldn't push more
than 600Mbit natively (without shaping). I felt that the ethernet
driver could be improved significantly after looking it over, but
didn't care for the 600mbit as a starting point to have to improve
from.

Not ruling it out, though! It met quite a few requirements we have.

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Erkki Lintunen <ebirdie@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> while enjoying and reading another thread from the list...
>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] how is everyone's uptime?
>> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:42:37 -0800
>> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> [snip]
>> But frankly, I would prefer for most of the chaos there to subside and to find
>> a new, additional platform, to be working on before resuming work,
>> that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. And
>> to be more openwrt compatible in whatever we do, whatever that is.
>
> this reminded me that another day I passed a web-page of a platform and
> in the hope this has not been on the list yet passing it forward.
>
> <http://www.pcengines.ch/apu.htm>
>
> An interesting tidbit in the platform is the choice of firmware, I
> think. Haven't seen any board yet with the similar choice by the
> manufacturer. With a quick summing from the vendor part catalog, the
> platform is sub 200 EUR (238 USD in current exchange rate) for an about
> working assembly of 3x 1GbE, 4G ram, 1G flash, 802.11a/b/g/n radio...
>
> I can't say anything how capable the hw might be for the stated inbound
> shaping performance. I have had an ALIX board from their previous
> generation for years and its been humming nicely though I haven't pushed
> it to its envelope.
>
> Best
> Erkki
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel



-- 
Dave Täht

thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-12 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-10 22:52 [Cerowrt-devel] how is everyone's uptime? Dave Taht
2014-12-11 19:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-12-11 21:50   ` Dave Taht
2014-12-12  0:18     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2014-12-12  0:22       ` Dave Taht
2014-12-12  0:32 ` Aaron Wood
2014-12-12  0:42   ` Dave Taht
2014-12-12  7:33     ` [Cerowrt-devel] an option for a new platform? Erkki Lintunen
2014-12-12 14:52       ` Dave Taht [this message]
2014-12-13 23:02         ` David P. Reed
2014-12-16  9:02           ` Dave Taht
2014-12-12  1:30 ` [Cerowrt-devel] how is everyone's uptime? Joseph Swick
2014-12-12  1:52 ` Jim Gettys

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw63tNVYanzYHkUxST2pr=x6ZsCJWcabgpLibA10iCk85g@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=ebirdie@iki.fi \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox