From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ve0-f171.google.com (mail-ve0-f171.google.com [209.85.128.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A99F4208ABD for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:24:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ve0-f171.google.com with SMTP id b10so6100193vea.16 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:24:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RIhrXYJYcI96taT0UZMAhy7rLU2VNIxg67NXhpar15Y=; b=rtjEmU00pyiuDWvgrBHeVWYk2v6XVtENSWDLK4+RdvXyfPZ0TNMggTQX7uV1K+yMcl ZZ1QCUdSgZcF/FduwXDdiYjaaOuUiuq2cyq3lqH3ZpdlnYnVDfb8DtbCgj/BHyDrS4iW LBCMxhR68ItskfBMPd5PsuTCAk+V5/WbUJzWywN4aQA505w0svxxa5zXrrwgXetoTr06 yLs5g47p3vWmMOSvM/3wNxioi9eygsI7HaJMjPnS7wnTBaiZrLrzNpLFEHXKmApw9j7z Rmnq1+NMPSaeivL27mzpnXd4IDRVmRyNIrTnXrMOY8PxNSQfdM1zCmBcFPTV7cRUlZMF q4Xg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.143.116 with SMTP id sd20mr10574630veb.39.1362518648421; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:24:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.169.77 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:24:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 13:24:07 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6dc6ce0a397904d73418fc Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] freezing... and updating the web site to point to modena X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:24:09 -0000 --047d7b6dc6ce0a397904d73418fc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am extremely pleased with 3.7.5-2. All the reports are positive, the test deployment at the yurtlab went well, and I would like to make it be the new "stable" release of cerowrt ASAP. However, to do that, will require updating the website to "point to the right stuff", and moving the sugarland doc to other places... I wouldn't mind TRYING to get out a 3.7.10 based release, and to call this one merely a "strong beta", if y'all prefer. I would certainly prefer to wait until the official release of dnsmasq is out in particular, before calling this version of cerowrt totally baked... but it's pretty darn good and by far the most well tested cerowrt ever. I am low on time before ietf 86, but will have some time this week to edit, if I can get someone(s) to step up on some of the heavy lifting on the doc front. ? Big things to do before another release in this series would be updating the onboard documentation, looking hard at a couple bugs, maybe adding in the fw3 code or making the jump to 3.8. but I'd rather just freeze on basically what we got, and call it a dev cycle. What say you all? --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html --047d7b6dc6ce0a397904d73418fc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am extremely pleased with 3.7.5-2. All the reports are positive, the test= deployment at the yurtlab went well,=A0 and I would like to make it be the= new "stable" release of cerowrt ASAP.

However, to do that= , will require updating the website to "point to the right stuff"= , and moving the sugarland doc to other places...

I wouldn't mind TRYING to get out a 3.7.10 based release, and to ca= ll this one merely a "strong beta", if y'all prefer. I would = certainly prefer to wait until the official release of dnsmasq is out in pa= rticular, before calling this version of cerowrt totally baked... but it= 9;s pretty darn good and by far the most well tested cerowrt ever.

I am low on time before ietf 86, but will have some time this week to e= dit, if I can get someone(s) to step up on some of the heavy lifting on the= doc front. ?

Big things to do before another release in this series= would be updating the onboard documentation, looking hard at a couple bugs= , maybe adding in the fw3 code or making the jump to 3.8.

but I'd rather just freeze on basically what we got, and call it a = dev cycle.

What say you all?



--
Dav= e T=E4ht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/= cerowrt/subscribe.html=20 --047d7b6dc6ce0a397904d73418fc--