On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org> wrote:

> On 2015-03-16 17:58, Dave Taht wrote:
> > I folded in the following:
> >
> >   * minstrel-blues
> As far as I know, this is not really "minstrel-blues", this is a minor
> set of minstrel tweaks.
>
> >   * minstrel patches for minimum variance (hurts udp, helps tcp)
> Is this the same patches that you sent a while back?
>
> Yes. They did leverage a function call from the above.


> >   * babel-1.6.0 release candidate
> >   * cake and the usual slew of alternate bufferbloat-fighting qdiscs
> >
> > I intended to use this build to test my ubnt gear and the archer c7v2.
> > It is NOT cerowrt...
> >
> > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/ubnt/ar71xx/
> Where's the source? I can't find it on your github...
>
>
One of my goals is to work more closely within openwrt's structures this
time around,
I only did that build because half my campus network is breaking on a
regular basis and I have *gotta*  fix that.

> 1) But before I even got so far as trying that build, ran across this
> > ticket.
> >
> > https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19194
> Haven't seen any similar reports from other people yet, might be a
> device specific quirk or broken hw or something, I don't know yet.
>
> > 2) Is the consensus here we should resume using the "device naming by
> > security model" mode?
> >
> > 3) Things I would like to be developing and then testing
> >   * latest dnsmasq code (with fixed date getting stuff to hopefully
> > finally make it up to openwrt)
> >   * latest FIB patches backported to 3.18 (or, possibly, moving to 4.0)
> The FIB patches that went into 4.0 are already in OpenWrt trunk ;)
>

Would like to update the ar71xx code also, if possible?


> - Felix
>



-- 
Dave Täht
Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!

https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb