On 2015-03-16 17:58, Dave Taht wrote:
> I folded in the following:
>
>   * minstrel-blues
As far as I know, this is not really "minstrel-blues", this is a minor
set of minstrel tweaks.

>   * minstrel patches for minimum variance (hurts udp, helps tcp)
Is this the same patches that you sent a while back?

>   * babel-1.6.0 release candidate
>   * cake and the usual slew of alternate bufferbloat-fighting qdiscs
>
> I intended to use this build to test my ubnt gear and the archer c7v2.
> It is NOT cerowrt...
>
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/ubnt/ar71xx/
Where's the source? I can't find it on your github...

> 1) But before I even got so far as trying that build, ran across this
> ticket.
>
> https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19194
Haven't seen any similar reports from other people yet, might be a
device specific quirk or broken hw or something, I don't know yet.

> 2) Is the consensus here we should resume using the "device naming by
> security model" mode?
>
> 3) Things I would like to be developing and then testing
>   * latest dnsmasq code (with fixed date getting stuff to hopefully
> finally make it up to openwrt)
>   * latest FIB patches backported to 3.18 (or, possibly, moving to 4.0)
The FIB patches that went into 4.0 are already in OpenWrt trunk ;)

- Felix