From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C60EA21F201 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oigv203 with SMTP id v203so12259379oig.3 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Hr+KlhcnjY6O/n5EoJ9Gl1B9DecBkBIkRaHT4LUieX8=; b=NLirvSkgWyPizDwGbDJPMBLdrB9O28RW/mcGCdZh3sj1lw7mMr7GYNmbSrmVcztOMR qdmiJIHZ7Lr98p3SNZV/Eba8AaLxySk+PEV7+hOpLuwKOct8OkMsG4KpjSvctNa6dJSd JFL9dDmgWbAHzRtJnTbR710GKe4WiTXIVYXrpysZMaP3v1k5XFrcUtbTBpgl92cNgorD QvlSJUEeHh3q6srxxjj1wVTlK3/b5jO72SgYIALmlF1JyZLnAzBBfZMSwHw6TGV8v2bW nLRVMQC2DTHi45I9jaJt34oPKmEkbU8ht+P5uX3LMtY7lXWqLvp9IWSwqR74WKyAaJdN SEiQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.3.65 with SMTP id 62mr46686471oid.11.1426533541600; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:19:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <550726B8.2060807@openwrt.org> References: <550726B8.2060807@openwrt.org> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:19:01 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Felix Fietkau Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ba08001e33505116cb97c Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] did a chaos calmer openwrt build, untested X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:19:31 -0000 --001a113ba08001e33505116cb97c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2015-03-16 17:58, Dave Taht wrote: > > I folded in the following: > > > > * minstrel-blues > As far as I know, this is not really "minstrel-blues", this is a minor > set of minstrel tweaks. > > > * minstrel patches for minimum variance (hurts udp, helps tcp) > Is this the same patches that you sent a while back? > > Yes. They did leverage a function call from the above. > > * babel-1.6.0 release candidate > > * cake and the usual slew of alternate bufferbloat-fighting qdiscs > > > > I intended to use this build to test my ubnt gear and the archer c7v2. > > It is NOT cerowrt... > > > > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/ubnt/ar71xx/ > Where's the source? I can't find it on your github... > > One of my goals is to work more closely within openwrt's structures this time around, I only did that build because half my campus network is breaking on a regular basis and I have *gotta* fix that. > 1) But before I even got so far as trying that build, ran across this > > ticket. > > > > https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19194 > Haven't seen any similar reports from other people yet, might be a > device specific quirk or broken hw or something, I don't know yet. > > > 2) Is the consensus here we should resume using the "device naming by > > security model" mode? > > > > 3) Things I would like to be developing and then testing > > * latest dnsmasq code (with fixed date getting stuff to hopefully > > finally make it up to openwrt) > > * latest FIB patches backported to 3.18 (or, possibly, moving to 4.0) > The FIB patches that went into 4.0 are already in OpenWrt trunk ;) > Would like to update the ar71xx code also, if possible? > - Felix > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb --001a113ba08001e33505116cb97c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Felix Fietkau <<= a href=3D"mailto:nbd@openwrt.org" target=3D"_blank">nbd@openwrt.org>= wrote:
On 2015-0= 3-16 17:58, Dave Taht wrote:
> I folded in the following:
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* minstrel-blues
As far as I know, this is not really "minstrel-blues", thi= s is a minor
set of minstrel tweaks.

>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* minstrel patches for minimum variance (hurts udp, helps = tcp)
Is this the same patches that you sent a while back?

Yes. They did leverage a func= tion call from the above.
=C2=A0
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* babel-1.6.0 release candidate
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* cake and the usual slew of alternate bufferbloat-fightin= g qdiscs
>
> I intended to use this build to test my ubnt gear and the archer c7v2.=
> It is NOT cerowrt...
>
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/ubnt/ar71xx/
Where's the source? I can't find it on your github...


One of my goal= s is to work more closely within openwrt's structures this time around,=
I only did that build because half my campus network is brea= king on a regular basis and I have *gotta*=C2=A0 fix that.

> 1) But before I even got so far as trying that build, ran across this<= br> > ticket.
>
> htt= ps://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/19194
Haven't seen any similar reports from other people yet, might be= a
device specific quirk or broken hw or something, I don't know yet.

> 2) Is the consensus here we should resume using the "device namin= g by
> security model" mode?
>
> 3) Things I would like to be developing and then testing
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* latest dnsmasq code (with fixed date getting stuff to ho= pefully
> finally make it up to openwrt)
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0* latest FIB patches backported to 3.18 (or, possibly, mov= ing to 4.0)
The FIB patches that went into 4.0 are already in OpenWrt trunk ;)

Would like to update the ar71xx code also, if possible= ?
=C2=A0
= - Felix



--
Dave T=C3=A4ht
Let's make wifi fast, less jitt= ery and reliable again!

https://plus.google.c= om/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
--001a113ba08001e33505116cb97c--