From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ia0-f174.google.com (mail-ia0-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E06321F0AE for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:05:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ia0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y25so9261564iay.33 for ; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:05:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lL5zqx4sXe6H+3gf7xykZHIZ7X4f9Iq3BHxeweBOV7w=; b=WsEWiM2f8AkEfTF61PZQ2puri28zYNoav5SVC+RntEJQglPHBI85KgspSc6YlFhXns g69Cran6NgB+j5MWCWESSbkPFyWkH5UX7r6jQv3nPU39HXrmRKx+JJR3fcckylNe7v3p tYns1AefrQq60lImHd+8YydzpgA3oBU4frNGxAX+kNApuK9PUcCcw3ZrF47ydM9Amhni KtJl9TX4IrJp5pahMGE9So1T1Dlb2xabpEM6+V5RinJUdvNZgF6Jkv06WGgpHXHMSRaD oQQggYWy8WOQwThQ+xUGMa8E33DzVFd0yfuPmJlJiZM+QXcmMkRnZ83WjcTfSqlx/9R6 4SKw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.88.136 with SMTP id bg8mr26364673igb.96.1356750319210; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:05:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.135.39 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:05:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <50DDDD58.9090901@openwrt.org> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 22:05:19 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Maciej Soltysiak Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Latest IPv6 Updates X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 03:05:20 -0000 On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Maciej Soltysiak wr= ote: > Upnp works fine. > Ssdpd doesn't, not sure why, it's late now. will test tomorrow. > > p.s. /use/shin/simple_qos fails on non-existant /etc/functions.sh > Am I doing something wrong? No. Probably that changed. You can comment that out. I see also that nfq_codel on the nano-m build failed to link right. Might just be a bug on that build. insmod sch_nfq_codel on cero. > > Maciej > > On 28 Dec 2012 21:19, "Dave Taht" wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Steven Barth wrote= : >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > the following updates / changes for IPv6 have been commited to OpenWrt >> > in >> > the last days. Most of these affect RFC 6204 CE-compliance, some are >> > convenience changes. >> > >> > Feel free to merge and test CeroWrt. >> >> I have merged with openwrt head, and updated to dnsmasq 2.66test4, and >> also folded in the tiny luci upnp fix to the '&' issue. I'm not really >> sure if that last is the right thing, it's supposed to be >> translated... >> >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.6.11-4/ >> >> I am still not in a position to test anything cerowrt related myself >> right now, although I am down to a mere 20 miles between me and the >> yurtlab and 50 from isc. >> >> I am relieved to hear that amazon claims they will get new supplies of >> the wndr3800 by jan 5. >> >> I am staring at the bunch of hardware I ordered in something of a >> panic - dreamplug, wndr4300, the nanostations, a couple bus pirates, a >> nexus 7, and trying to figure out a direction to move forward that >> makes sense. >> >> > * Detect and delegate IPv6-specific MTU from upstream interfaces (e.g. >> > tunnels, pppoe, etc.) and propagate them to downstream interfaces >> > (supporting cases where IPv4-MTU and IPv6-MTU differ, e.g. 6in4, 6rd, >> > 6to4, >> > ...) >> >> Excellent! PPPoE? >> >> > * Add a default null-route for delegated prefixes (CE-requirement WPD-= 6) >> > This fixes routing loops in case packets with a destination within an >> > unused >> > / unassigned part of a delegated prefix are received. >> > >> > * Added support for site-borders (interfaces which ULA-traffic might n= ot >> > cross) as specified in CE-requirement ULA-4 >> > >> > * Added support to override CE-requirement ULA-5 for NPT-setups (iirc >> > not >> > relevant if dnsmasq is used, as it does not follow ULA-5). >> > >> > >> > Documentation on http://wiki.openwrt.org/doc/uci/network6 has been >> > updated. >> > >> > >> > >> > Btw. Simon Kelley released 2.66-test4 which fixes some bugs related to >> > stateful DHCPv6 and should make it usable finally. Also the new >> > MTU-propagation mentioned above is now supported by dnsmasq as well. >> > I haven't tested it myself yet but you can try if you are brave. >> >> I folded in the same patches as were used in 2.66-test3. >> >> A good default configuration for cero would be good, Not sure what that >> is... >> >> > >> > I will try to make a table about the RFC requirements for Customer Edg= e >> > (CE)-Routers soon which sums up which requirements are fulfilled and >> > which >> > are still not implemented both for CeroWrt / OpenWrt with 6relayd and >> > with >> > dnsmasq as RA/DHCPv6-server. >> > >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > Steven >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> >> >> >> -- >> Dave T=E4ht >> >> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: >> http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html