From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D940021F1D1 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oier21 with SMTP id r21so44185400oie.1 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:35:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Y+D8QGVORRiDqo28h0EBSVt3dcEGsdgiT3WXJZieYc0=; b=GP4KzJ/vdAm5LMm1HgAI1o/mxjMkB+c6D8Tp31Rwe+7dNypSuQqvcF6hPG35aC2vjA adr9N//KNUz4HE0y5j0asDF89KpjdMh3E+Quk8YKRqhn98B9Gcfaz9o4YQkiFAuI+OUO cn/Ps/pbzJsD0ryGjyY8uf2NH2IjY9GBGZ5/GNixn0z8vbQg+TCknjrCbDtUY7kHxSE8 rHS5xilyl2VWCItYZMm9ze6geeJR8pe9bXgF+TgdGq/ivZso0VLg2c1FTTCl/5ueCGLk 7kWMGp7gg4csPiEpW4AJo35DaKAAMMaw8OpYFHoSUhlxVrXLdFe4AqeZ0M3dxttsCKY8 2a+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.111.131 with SMTP id v3mr38154467oik.133.1426527311602; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:35:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:35:11 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: David Lang Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142888eabab8605116b453e Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] the 3 focus problems we have X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:35:41 -0000 --001a1142888eabab8605116b453e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang wrote: > On Mon, 16 Mar 2015, Dave Taht wrote: > > 1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So fa= r >> that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an >> alternative. >> > > If you are using a x86 processor, how much cpu does this take? diddly. > > David Lang > > > 2) We need a new box that anyone can use that should be available for 2-= 3 >> years to come. >> >> 3) I'd like to be focused mostly on wifi, personally. >> >> Do we have more top-level problems than this? >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb --001a1142888eabab8605116b453e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, David Lang <david@lang.hm>= wrote:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2= 015, Dave Taht wrote:

1) We need a new box that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. So far that box has not appeared. We have not explored policing as an alternative.=

If you are using a x86 processor, how much cpu does this take?
=

diddly.
=C2=A0

David Lang


2) We need a new box that anyone can use that should be available for 2-3 years to come.

3) I'd like to be focused mostly on wifi, personally.

Do we have more top-level problems than this?


_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel




--
Dave T=C3=A4ht
Let's make wifi fast, less jit= tery and reliable again!

https://plus.google.= com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
--001a1142888eabab8605116b453e--