From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D60B721F91E for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:58:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oigb199 with SMTP id b199so85947726oig.3 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:58:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EZ6mtcJjpSp8iOJpwBE1kI0nNWf+06CI7rJLbg2ByvE=; b=yA1JlNfgZoIbsyp4yslAEh48WHbikZ9PvEngcwfJ+GNdvomLL0mJ74EHv5X1qsVGlF OQ2k8RzBw6tbsoiZYvduaLOMzvnZbNCcNpEi0sY96NF6VrT+L2bXE301uhNjX9ybPQGz eQ1SUlOpRObOiM56fwwJsd84teAqtvgGEfBwtTpVy/envIrl8D/LjHQu3IHKZ/cbQNYm Rw4P+qAh7ftWmDYmvzvo6L+Dp+alh+Hh9AsQ4fOhqSLpJN1ckegEZBswgIlNHBLfVss3 hqkqVl4/Aa/N+pC2SRzogyqNjs2ET7kA8Es/2VK1O5s8kpBj+Ong9nxrJUKKOHp1hDiI XjlQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.49.212 with SMTP id x203mr3504300oix.81.1435363138919; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.129 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:58:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:58:58 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jim Gettys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Any chance for the LUCI GUI for cake appearing? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 23:59:28 -0000 Honestly, you cannot draw that conclusion on cake yet. The new firmware forwarded at something like 35% better rates than the old.[1] So if you can show a dsireports speedtest on your hardware, on fq_codel, also... that would be confirmation we are winning on cake on your hardware. [1] I have great hope that the new FIB stuff in 4.0 and later will also do magic for forwarding rates. On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Jim Gettys wrote: > Thank you all for cake... > > One of my recent pains had been that Comcast doubled my download speed to > 100mbps, and CeroWrt using fq_codel/htb couldn't hack anywhere near that > speed. > > Now I have things set using cake, and can do much better, and have my cak= e > and eat it too. > > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/749786 > - Jim > > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Sebastian Moeller wrot= e: >> >> >> On Jun 26, 2015, at 21:48 , Dave Taht wrote: >> >> > It turns out that I am pulling from openwrt for luci-app-sqm, not >> > ceropackages, and overriding it was a headache. Fixed now, see below >> > >> > router# cd /tmp; wget >> > http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero3/luci-app-sqm_3-5_all.ipk ; >> > opkg install ./luci-app-sqm_3-5_all.ipk >> > router # /etc/init.d/uhttpd restart >> > >> > if it breaks, you get to keep both pieces, but it worked for me, and >> > yea! cake in the gui! thx sebastian! >> >> Too cite Shaggy =E2=80=9CWasn=E2=80=99t me=E2=80=9D ;); the init= ial commit was not mine >> and I do not want to claim otherwise. I basically just rearranged the >> "deck-chairs" as I tend to think. I seem to be better at the =E2=80=9C l= ove for >> details=E2=80=9D thing than the=E2=80=9Dbig picture=E2=80=9D, anyways >> Best Regards >> Sebastian >> >> > >> > >> > I tried - >> > >> > ./scripts feeds uninstall luci-app-sqm; ./scripts feeds install -p >> > cero luci-app-sqm # seemed sane, did not work >> > git rm in the feed itself did not work >> > doing the uninstall, deleting the symlink, and the git rm, nuking the >> > bin/ar71xx/packages/packages/luci-app-sqm* >> > and doing a complete rebuild... eventually did work... but strikes me >> > as a bit more brute force than I wanted. >> > >> > I am not in a position (aformentioned build is my specialized for >> > pico/nano build at the moment) to update the packages db, >> > but I stuck up the correct new package... which you can install via >> > >> > >> > Apologies for the confusion, I simply figured that the -p option would >> > work, and never checked. >> > >> > I also note that I think I am building things compile tuned for the >> > archer mips34c, rather thanthe wndr3800=C2=B4s 24c. However I kept the >> > unaligned access hacks (not needed on the 34c derived archer, but >> > needed on the 24c wndr3800) >> > >> > Sigh. >> > >> > maintaining 3 separate trees for the platforms we sort of support is a >> > PITA. Then adding in something that can mesh by default on 2 others. >> > and then trying to get anything to compile for another arch entirely >> > and failing... >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Sebastian Moeller >> > wrote: >> >> Hi Jim, >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 26, 2015, at 19:21 , Jim Gettys wrote: >> >> >> >>> Inquiring minds would like to know=E2=80=A6. >> >> >> >> I guess, that depends on your definition of =E2=80=9CLUCI GUI = for cake=E2=80=9D; >> >> as far as I know you can select cake in the =E2=80=9CQueueing Discipl= ine=E2=80=9D drop down >> >> in the =E2=80=9CQueue Discipline=E2=80=9D tab of luci-app-sqm. So if = the machine has the >> >> cake module and a sufficiently recent (out-of-tree) tc binary install= ed it >> >> should just work. Using the =E2=80=9CAdvanced option strings=E2=80=A6= =E2=80=9D it even should be >> >> possible to pass arbitrary strings to cake (without any error checkin= g), so >> >> I assume we are all set up for cake testing (or should that be cake >> >> tasting?) from the LUCI GUI. But I have not managed to build cake loc= ally, >> >> nor have I dared to risk my families internet connectivity by trying = one of >> >> Dave=E2=80=99s newer "openwrt trunk with cake=E2=80=9D builds. So the= se changes linger in >> >> the ceropackages-3.10 repository until we get enough tasting to convi= nce >> >> Toke to pull them into the openwrt repositories (these changes affect= both >> >> sqm-scripts and luci-app-sqm). Dave graciously allowed me access to o= ne of >> >> his test machines, and the changes allow to set up cake from the GUI,= but I >> >> only did limited functionality testing. (And we discovered that somet= hing >> >> was of in that cake worked but did not accept all the keywords it sho= uld >> >> have, but unless you are on a XDSL-Link you most likely do not care a= bout >> >> specifying per-packet-overhead) >> >> If you have any specific thing you are missing, let me know an= d >> >> I will try to help. >> >> >> >> Best Regards >> >> Sebastian >> >> >> >> >> >>> - Jim >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> >>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Dave T=C3=A4ht >> > worldwide bufferbloat report: >> > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat >> > And: >> > What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? >> > https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast >> > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast