From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFECC21F100 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b13so5013149wgh.0 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:53:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ObUgmgo+TqP9BMSys60zNoBbJf6gcBKcUI4o7s1/9sw=; b=RsWtPl1Bl3NvMhdnuu/dg3mmjgiU1YDxi2UxyPLe8LQYeMO/28wq7DXOo/HYTLSvx6 /OLLdzUx/mDBlhWyRKoILnqSRE6afNzCWBo9MFIiuO272URBBPJ2iE1n/LyHBPBWlx2E JKgwjwTbUD2vmxZVo7EKZGx1cLuoxRA+JlocDTPM9mYIk3j9VJtgJpk5QUA5uUbRBsys aUK081V+jxVohh7g9xvSI7trw/UXWSIjgBSlVBjRHvb4Kx/eHDqhL/cbcRIje1W1LflA nimdMTidR/ojS5QyDElbr94ttvIUS6rA0xUg+0km5gAYp+ERapTyaiUFqoBgexiJEm0Q Jlsw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.189.132 with SMTP id gi4mr11181662wic.19.1382381610880; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.67.202 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:53:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 nat X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:53:33 -0000 there has been ipv6 nat support in cero for a while, if anyone wants to try= it. Rumor has it that comcast is only handing out a /60 address, which, while enough for 2.5 cero routers is kind of annoying compared to the address cornucopia that is ipv6. I'm not happy with the state of AHCP, but as it's possible to get by on a single /64 with that + babel, perhaps more will fiddle with that, too. Similarly I kind of foresee ipv6 nat happening for tethered phones, too, Anyway, ipv6 nat. in the same sentence. I wish it didn't have to have come to this... --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html