From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60D723CC1D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:48:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id y204so108094623oie.3 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:48:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vmk5cWRaU0qSXswqoNyd7lU08z39skMF08YHLtFubEo=; b=tYr4W6IAHRq7lmmk4ct5ojW3cpx1fpaQwXZl9A8PeF6O/AcZW5Gaha/D3haz15Br3I 3EAkHnVQ4VEVtMH8+OXhO6gI0hKkiqt04YNM0VGFzibjNuEfAslpSyHmuTe8FhF5rByL LNx8QdMMJi0rQhb1f/uiasOxLBjsSTSGl/1X9vrUUnuFAJBsZKVtFWaOma+tPEQiNIEc q1mD/9MDH9bLE5UM3puBgCUrQs39vyarc8Co3I+h+ta0H7+bSOzv1fa4zcG/sZJWTMm9 3NSpdGJTg8PF6uUplmn5Cmpp0P776xIo2b9iUF6OorGOH1YOzyf6DWIrKG/Ho7h46mDH qqRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vmk5cWRaU0qSXswqoNyd7lU08z39skMF08YHLtFubEo=; b=er8eZVvvfmbEGzPmIS3tEQrm4tMntO+nYXp2U+kJhGrC/AHSOv4Fpyavdfd5MANmD3 cHiA6WDDs1Cg4+VOSzCZtRvPd5gPkFIec5LLCO2oECnRN3xK0V7pEnaySpeS2hHxrczO clNu/baIuyAg0rwV/n51wNz9eUCA7eOCHAo8MJBhsEYvhV6sm4u/jcH5m7ryJrq3hCdT 9HSENFFjJuoNx2fBF5CWt9v4vl1ppYsQk68Gr/DmlbPF433U0kqp5MrecWLWmVsWuMt6 RQj6VbSI6XluSSx+B8tBbmPC4rJqimHhfCZqCFLat5FKWVIO+IpOdcf4dooHQ0wnNA+U 7+IA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL8wqBtiIanfUqq//I3OreRpDj2Zw4JLAA924chKYmu+0R/AEfr+hJDbtNl4qZx11jAwg9A/9QvmP9R7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.157.57.131 with SMTP id y3mr1946855otb.169.1460051296827; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.79.215 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <57066793.5050608@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:48:16 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Aaron Wood Cc: Richard Smith , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Linksys wrt1900acs rrul traces X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:48:17 -0000 It was not in my opinion, "ready" for use as a full time router, as of a few weeks ago. In particular, the wifi was intolerably buggy and needed a reboot after heavy use. The ethernet side has got to "usable", and things like cake are working ok. I am not working very hard on it as I'm trying to swallow the ath10k fq_codel patches and overall ath9k drivers as I write. If your family can put up with it, more knowledgable users such as yourself will find more bugs and get them fixed faster. ;) I did pick up an edgerouter X the other day, it is kind of my hope to get cake on that (somehow), and see how it does, and keep offloading the wifi to another box entirely. Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software! https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Aaron Wood wrote: > These are really impressive results (flent graphs attached for the "simpl= e" > operation). > > Especially so, considering to what I see with sqm_scripts on the same > hardware with CCrc3: > http://burntchrome.blogspot.com/2015/06/sqmscripts-before-and-after-at-16= 0mbps.html > > Is this stable enough for full-time usage (as a home router)? > > -Aaron > > On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Richard Smith wrote= : >> >> A while ago I mentioned that I purchased a Linksys wrt1900acs and I was >> going to do some comparisons of speed/rrul for stock firmware and stuff >> running sqm. >> >> It took a while to happen but I finally got it done. I was stalled for = a >> long time because for a while OpenWRT was not complete for this router. = It >> would boot but you could not (easily) return to the factory firmware as >> updates via the OpenWRT web interface did not work. >> >> Command line updates still worked though periodically I would build dd >> head and see if it got fixed. Finally one weekend I decided to dig in a= nd >> figure out what was going wrong and discovered that someone else beat me= to >> it and it all was working now. >> >> The following flent rrul runs were run here on my local Gbit network >> (pretty quiet) using with OpenWrt Designated Driver r49051 / LuCI Master >> (git-16.081.38806-6b9a743) + Cake installed. >> >> Cake installed via the instructions here: >> >> >> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Cake#Installing-CAKE-out-= of-tree-on-OpenWrt-rough-instructions >> >> For these tests I had the inbound and outbound limits set to 975000 kbps= . >> 975000 was somewhat arbitrary. I wanted it below 1Gbps enough that I co= uld >> be sure it was the router as the limit but yet fast enough that I would = be >> able to see the peak transfer rates. >> >> Test setup is: >> >> Laptop<-->wrt1900acs<--->Gbit Switch<--->Netperf server >> >> Prior to running the tests I did trial runs without the wrt1900acs in th= e >> chain to verify every thing worked at Gbit speeds. >> >> I ran the rrul test for each of the SQM settings at least 5 times. For >> layer cake and piece of cake each had a run with results that were way o= ff >> from the previous run. I'm assuming this is some yet to be fixed issue = and >> so I ran it 1 more time so that there were 5 runs with similar results. >> >> All the raw files are in this tarball: >> >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-P0wCbNmKvAWmRUSzNMdXpUOFE/view?usp=3D= sharing >> >> Hope this is helpful. I'll be happy to run any additional tests if >> someone wants more. >> >> -- >> Richard A. Smith >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >