From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CBF121F0F0 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id wm4so1177211obc.7 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:37:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OR2wEFRF81IU3MRh+xYkoDfSvlCb/Hzpocz+3G1vQ7k=; b=o8pznYcJZDR2fM+cYNXw0Hu/+P8MqFqnEwjInpTMgFR0HCnW4KaooLF7Q7R8MNOV8W mmQfQDVVSvQv4uLhvNlr5nWqxPZ+dx5GxeWC/xOjCbkJkpOIa1tPV623bUFXTGpVP3vQ 0AcdFFHh4uGpT0X3crMzNQ6zYE/TWNH99YLP010pIxbnFYRAvCJSkY41vm/v0lHOK9g/ oDsgGK5FqvtCEYxtgqFXMtL1m0+wYt8TId9Q9QCILbND9OlrOyqJZDaOCS0iDC4A+Ghe SeVtCSYAfuidWV2AohDa01n4sRHeTjNTDYSyZmUlT/GzP48VrN6jM07VchhsEVH8ET1c iMKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.176.103 with SMTP id ch7mr4299783oec.64.1403653022683; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.48.200 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:37:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140624160944.41e7317d@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <20140624160944.41e7317d@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:37:02 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Stephen Hemminger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt-3.10.44-5 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:37:04 -0000 On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:33:59 -0700 > Dave Taht wrote: > >> + resync with openwrt head >> updates to iw, mac80211 >> various routing table fixes in netifd >> >> + dnsmasq 2.71 with mini-gmp and libnettle mainlined >> also moved into procd for better automagic restart >> (this leaves babel as the only major daemon not managed by procd. sig= h) >> >> - totally untested (I tested -4 pretty thoroughly though) >> I won't have time for this personally til later this week. >> - still no answer for bug 442 - I do get bad things to happen on a >> ubnt device now >> - left off on the homewrt integration for now >> >> I need to get around to submitting sqm upstream again, but am busy on >> other tasks. >> IETF is coming up, also. >> > > Is this going to be any more stable? I almost about to give up > on cerowrt for home use and go to dd-wrt or something else. > Wireless still crashes once a week with 3.10.36-6 I think bug 442 is universal across openwrt derived versions for the last 5+ months. There is (no longer) any real difference between the network stacks of cero and openwrt. I do think cero triggers it more often by using adhoc mode, multiple wifi interfaces, and routing, and I'd suggest to those using it to disable the guest and adhoc interfaces entirely and see what happens. (definately kill adhoc unless you are using it) otherwise... I too, despair. What I have been doing is developing means to saturate links for long periods, take big packet captures, and for all that I've only seen that bug 3 times, all 3 uncaptured. Yet others get it all the time. It is costing users hair, me time, and money I cannot spend on this project, and hurting other efforts. I would have released a "stable" version months ago if it wasn't for this. I'll miss you if you leave! but if you had a stabler version that you liked, you can regress to that - or by all means! give modern dd-wrt a shot - it's got most of the core features cero has by now, and I haven't tried it lately. --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht NSFW: https://w2.eff.org/Censorship/Internet_censorship_bills/russell_0296_= indecent.article