From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8631F21FB6D for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 11:04:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbkm3 with SMTP id km3so92612619obb.1 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 11:04:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=V7qNq6JhqupXVZ3vA46ZpaH1At3K4d1cxTTcTbdXRJU=; b=Q2/rraHKL2ky8mPoiw5kdlF/EhP5ITHGhrxpDaD5V1/tBvId+34KfmsJmJZyU3O1+5 40isntKDoOkLtPSufLV29Z/1vw0Ar3E5G928l8soVyILh8fe7yQscNEPwEgd1cZ5+Yxj 9tXZTxFQr1Mahy1/IntUOPHYOqQELjwjf6DNKIaZgV3TIJpkw7sHohsnGgxzrnPhZXoL dqfaQ9aA9TKsYi+1nayR8REVNhBYxi6vSJDo+6Pu8AUN+sHgf/gyziAQ/v4YB49gTmMK mPdPuAAdnYJNlUyUqJ5ZYjSlG1pybWUpbGkWoIEr09VCYN+7Dg/tx0qTIOyBF4JbwzAG ZQcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.227.15 with SMTP id a15mr10083188oih.59.1435514686830; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 11:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.105.129 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Jun 2015 11:04:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8B853F1C-DE5D-4F3D-88CC-CB8DA2D3E8B1@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 11:04:46 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jonathan Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] performance numbers from WRT1200AC (Re: Latest build test - new sqm-scripts seem to work; "cake overhead 40" didn't) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:05:16 -0000 htb + cake is the wrong configuration. :) cake has an integral bandwidth limiter and diffserv, there should be no htb here and it looked like their was. I have only been using the "simplest" qdisc, possibly the script for the simple qdisc is wrong? On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Jonathan Morton w= rote: > To be honest, HTB + cake isn't really the preferred configuration. > > - Jonathan Morton > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht worldwide bufferbloat report: http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat And: What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone? https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast