From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-x22a.google.com (mail-qc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E842221F1A7 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:13:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e9so4286394qcy.15 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:13:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MX8KNw9b0074WJ5cy/R+NFuaY2SqUoUB9mqiiFXK1OQ=; b=tZPr3dLsX/EONBuQ9whoAkjL/vv+sO48sxRzcBIEt0/ppvUARfsvpRhejPFXBfdj0f nvovJQ2haZNaW0Npa7wYWii34tBxvbGYFkBkPha9MVWAsGz6GwRoAsN/Njew0cmZPS42 +iPEs7N5Iz7yTKPeZ6ssOy0NeybkXDoJ/g0zu4lfHVQzAq6G6Crw8RjCVd7ec45gTWH0 UJJeecaTDlaciTvP318f/MDbIohaTQ4EdQshjXD2jvN0K1tVsXIVOjkJtztXphKtBAY5 3FIKaitmyE+euV2VEuQKtOL4xqzwxEqXshClYnYy4Da8hG8cot0+19+6zzhZHQDdyI+e Cf0w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.98.135 with SMTP id o7mr14608229qge.102.1391721103381; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 13:11:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.27.133 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 13:11:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52F3FA22.3010404@pocock.com.au> References: <52E40E7E.8010902@pocock.com.au> <52F3F90C.9010806@pocock.com.au> <52F3FA22.3010404@pocock.com.au> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 16:11:43 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Daniel Pocock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] webrtc on cerowrt X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:13:42 -0000 On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 06/02/14 22:08, Dave Taht wrote: >>> Jitsi videobridge made a very compelling demo of this at FOSDEM on the >>> weekend >> >> Which? resiprocate? webrtc? fq_codel? :) >> >> > > WebRTC video conferencing in browsers > > Look at the little server, it is not much bigger than a business card: > > https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=3D0BwiF7kZbHitaLTdKMWFqb3ZHUmM&usp= =3Dsharing I had this stuff working in little servers 12 years ago. :) In terms of dealing with the SIP/RTP proxy situation, what I used to do was use split dns, aliasing pbx.taht.net to an internal server on the internal network, and to a cloud service on external. --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html