Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Luis E. Garcia" <luis@bitamins.net>
Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] USB3 or HDMI ethernet? - Are wires dead?
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:32:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6W7kuznwVYW3j+9OdvU_q_Z4iQJ9QDm+OXUnA+rZYK8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALnBQ5=X8+1nvggYbY-cpTrQq8e5UGCfANPsw+ycFq0Yh2=mXg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Luis E. Garcia <luis@bitamins.net> wrote:
> I agree with Michael - wired Ethernet is very stable  compared with
> Wireless.
> In crowed places where everyone has a WiFi router - the WiFi will experience
> random drops.

Yes, but we are all geeks here. Has J.Random User internalized that
wifi can really suck for TV usage?

> There is the inconvenient of cabling the place up - but the stability is
> very much worth it - but I've using PowerLine adapters to ease my way
> through for a couple of years now and they've always proven more reliable
> than WiFi - but they do tend to have a bandwidth cap.

I have also used powerline adaptors in the apt, while bloated and slow
(200/4mbit is what I get out of mine on the rrul test) - they only
exhibit 90ms delay under load. I wish there was a way to get into
these to get fq_codel in there, they are conceptually a lot simpler
than wifi... but I am only aware of one open source driver for one
chipset, and otherwise these little boxes are a mystery.


> Luis
> Let´s agree to disagree.
>
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
> wrote:
>>
>> Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>     > But it asks a question - if basic wifi-only + compute has fallen so
>>     > low, is ethernet dead? Every TV I've seen has both ethernet and
>> wifi, I
>>     > have no idea what percentage of real users are setting up ethernet
>> vs
>>     > wifi on them. (anyone?)
>>
>> Ethernet is not dead for the reasons that wifi is bloated.
>> I know when my neighbours are watching their wifi "FIBE TV", because my
>> wifi
>> tends to die.  (I think they do 802.11g without backoff to 802.11b)
>> *My* "TV" (Wii, OUYA) are on wires for this reason.
>>
>> I consider jamming their AP... I suspect that apartment dwellers will
>> begin
>> to learn to use the wire.
>>
>>     > What I sort of hope for is that your TV could become part of the
>>     > routing infrastructure in the house - *wired* - so you could attach
>>     > more devices to it that wouldn't need their own connections...
>>
>> I agree, it would be nice: the TV is big enough to put a pretty decent
>> antenna inside, and it's in the place where the people and devices are.
>>
>> I personally didn't understand why TiVo didn't buy Skype ten years ago.
>> TiVo
>> had simultaneous MP4 encode and decode and network; all it needed was a
>> USB
>> camera on top of the TV, and it's a video phone.
>>
>> --
>> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh
>> networks [
>> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network
>> architect  [
>> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails
>> [
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>



-- 
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-18 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-18 14:50 Dave Taht
2016-04-18 16:08 ` Michael Richardson
2016-04-18 16:14   ` Luis E. Garcia
2016-04-18 16:32     ` Dave Taht [this message]
2016-04-18 16:35 ` [Cerowrt-devel] [Bloat] " Jonathan Morton
2016-04-18 18:03   ` Aaron Wood
2016-04-18 23:10 ` [Cerowrt-devel] " Dave Taht
2016-04-19 17:51   ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw6W7kuznwVYW3j+9OdvU_q_Z4iQJ9QDm+OXUnA+rZYK8A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=luis@bitamins.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox