From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3278A21F54F for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:42:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id a3so4584210oib.28 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:42:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1/WPU+iUqD1x44Lv+5tQo1ZQnUbF14taKUxtd5Z2qBE=; b=NBSwnQz/j3oHHenUpS7PgcyDwldFOnaz9FhQPV2u0RVOm8UrCCJlAxPWJ3rk3azhDN H6XUpZFSHzpYt6L9LkvtAzLbnEKzxMtTDkfvrp1o5/vgds/77XV3+wO7wxoA5HUp63ke KtCp3fipn3AREa4OGsjCnXb6Ma72yZpaAQyDbOvr1ebBKJ6PxwnWkqO7GBvU+jddnn9T SKvuYCOpbPUz18HaDIQ7uIzoqQKZoKA67DRMPiLIxGEMFED4D7nqYm/zSWLeJByvRZ0p swbi6o83QNlQQVbsoqN566p3KCgVuBiFgjZSMkVJqRrV0Y44ETSE9cpHyrQ9O+1Yiqc6 wgag== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.241.133 with SMTP id wi5mr8368449obc.10.1418344957067; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:42:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.227.77 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:42:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:42:37 -0800 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Aaron Wood Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] how is everyone's uptime? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:43:06 -0000 On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Aaron Wood wrote: > Do I win any prizes? :) > > root@cerowrt:~# uptime > 16:27:49 up 74 days, 7:14, load average: 0.46, 0.17, 0.09 > > root@cerowrt:~# free total used free > shared buffers > Mem: 126256 49652 76604 0 0 > -/+ buffers: 49652 76604 > Swap: 0 0 0 > > root@cerowrt:~# df > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on > rootfs 14720 10912 3808 74% / > /dev/root 14720 10912 3808 74% / > tmpfs 63128 1916 61212 3% /tmp > tmpfs 512 0 512 0% /dev > > I'm not running guest or babel networks, just the 2.4 and 5GHz networks. > > However, I did discover a number of core dumps from miniupnpd... Please file a bug with the core dump. I can't remember how to turn those of= f (or on) right now, it is a single sysctl, and I should have turned it off, if I didn't. kernel traps? dmesg weirdnesses? logmesg? There are certainly a ton of accumulated cruft we can fix if and when we go back into a development cycle. I did do a chaos calmer openwrt build recently with all the new stuff (sqm, cake), and it has been doing well. But frankly, I would prefer for most of the chaos there to subside and to f= ind a new, additional platform, to be working on before resuming work, that can do inbound shaping at up to 300mbit. And to be more openwrt compatible in whatever we do, whatever that is. And I remain torn between updating 3.10.50 or moving forward to 3.14 or later and making all you folk reflash. ... I see this periodically on my 3.10.50 comcast gateway: Thu Dec 11 16:31:28 2014 daemon.info xinetd[2082]: At least 1 DENY_TIME has expired, global_no_access list updated Yea! blocking some probes from the outside world! And this: Thu Dec 11 16:31:55 2014 daemon.notice netifd: wan6 (1934): Command failed: Unknown error Thu Dec 11 16:32:25 2014 daemon.notice netifd: wan6 (1934): Command failed: Unknown error I am not happy with having a firewall reload for any reason but have not summoned the gumption to figure out how to do it more right. as for this: Thu Dec 11 14:58:56 2014 daemon.warn avahi-daemon[2144]: Received packet from invalid interface. It think this is also fending off an attacker. That said, mdns is what the homewrt folk used for hnetd (which has some big problems still in the daemons, and I have been having a few exchanges with the devs on that front. > > -Aaron > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> the lab where I was keeping a box up under load had a long enough >> power failure last week to keeelll my approximatively 76 days uptime. >> >> Anybody else got any record-holders here? >> >> I am interested in long term memory leakage (run a free), >> process usage (runaways like pimd), and growth in disk space usage (df), >> so output like >> >> uptime >> free >> df >> >> periodically would be nice. >> >> -- >> Dave T=C3=A4ht >> >> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks