From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x234.google.com (mail-ob0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AEF21F32A for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 16:05:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbec2 with SMTP id ec2so1553219obb.3 for ; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 16:05:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9UhJdii+Cv+uWiP1pXi4x1VyWYShPYv10sdNz0e/giQ=; b=0vuOlIBI38s5HUBfrM7HUTRTNNgCyPFvvxN5cPaaT4gPKPfCr3HUVc4xoTEOo+gCDa vavbpBhvzwH3uAwpYvkTtyrzdyDyFbmYh2WjBxI+KPv1UqxyZXc7fT5qFZQOZWrYobJE AfaP5uqZ5jrPFZXSUlwaPBMohFVhB8465F3zFxhtAmGz2ZZHuQAy2BX4Xf7VzUqz22Vu 5t0YHvi2AvIJqCbNFXn4l7zWcpV6PMgK+siHN8fYDy1Lq2NG2b+QOBNzuh/3Hepd8g7U ucmlHi6ARegnUzDtwpJc6R/oL5FzGrQf0rhIBbAzPKW/uq0kbMQJkv4hqQXhotFQX/wO E7Aw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.123.83 with SMTP id ly19mr10286070oeb.8.1428188707269; Sat, 04 Apr 2015 16:05:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 16:05:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fv8f4l3g.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> References: <87fv8f4l3g.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 16:05:07 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [homenet] draft-chroboczek-babel-doesnt-care-00 X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 23:05:37 -0000 one of the more enjoyable internet drafts I have read lately. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Juliusz Chroboczek Date: Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:52 PM Subject: [homenet] draft-chroboczek-babel-doesnt-care-00 To: Alia Atlas Cc: homenet@ietf.org, babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Alia, [Homenet and babel-users in copy of this mail.] In a previous conversation, you suggested I write down an applicability statement for Babel. However, I got bored in the middle, and ended up writing this: Babel doesn't care. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chroboczek-babel-doesnt-care-00 Please don't let the somewhat flippant title put you off -- somewhere within the verbiage, you will find an applicability statement (in Section 1.1). For people who are not familiar with Babel, I've done my best to give a protocol outline in Section 2 that might be easier to digest than RFC 6126. To my knowledge, there is nothing outright incorrect in this document, and I've removed almost all the jokes before submitting. -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ homenet mailing list homenet@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb