* [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: [homenet] draft-chroboczek-babel-doesnt-care-00
[not found] <87fv8f4l3g.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
@ 2015-04-04 23:05 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2015-04-04 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cerowrt-devel
one of the more enjoyable internet drafts I have read lately.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Date: Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 2:52 PM
Subject: [homenet] draft-chroboczek-babel-doesnt-care-00
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org, babel-users@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Alia,
[Homenet and babel-users in copy of this mail.]
In a previous conversation, you suggested I write down an applicability
statement for Babel. However, I got bored in the middle, and ended up
writing this:
Babel doesn't care.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chroboczek-babel-doesnt-care-00
Please don't let the somewhat flippant title put you off -- somewhere
within the verbiage, you will find an applicability statement (in Section
1.1).
For people who are not familiar with Babel, I've done my best to give
a protocol outline in Section 2 that might be easier to digest than RFC
6126. To my knowledge, there is nothing outright incorrect in this
document, and I've removed almost all the jokes before submitting.
-- Juliusz
_______________________________________________
homenet mailing list
homenet@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
--
Dave Täht
Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread