From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CA5621F1CE for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 23:38:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q58so807496wes.6 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 23:38:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lLHq1BMWEtNhjPn/NTVFOiQr1XrhvP4nXF+u2tsikV4=; b=Q5v9/2TICHuNSSbkcKAg6CgLbGbqaw2lj5pJgLPGp8Kk4vFber/DLkga//mZXvLCnq jX5K5zVpX1dKRS7gLkwjTlEfg8WfW5dnijKxRrveY1FN3OvtdMw3k04U0Yp5jj/4byBd SAgzX0XypvI1r/eNya0VPhL/N6THErjGQtXZE+dcAJIMoKgdDJ49mnEoMfGiQyy8vrDl wNyB2Wl96EOWv+BYJ8FkCHkaoUvhXBUUJrUD7LmWauAwDZBDZnasE0aFdj8QJJPKwvNW xVWi5UXllkdH3XmcDowfMIgY4vL9bcdp/F76sHteSvm3ffjn3jqMJ1TfPhWo2GsDWA4W XmVA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.207 with SMTP id by15mr2235988wib.48.1395815891234; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 23:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 23:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 23:38:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <9250.1395808974@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <20140201132948.GU15505@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> <20140326024008.GU7867@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> <9250.1395808974@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 23:38:11 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043c80465e779104f57cb6e0 Cc: Hauke Mehrtens , Steven Barth , "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] odhcp6c went crazy flooding Comcast with DHCPv6 SOLICITs X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 06:38:14 -0000 --f46d043c80465e779104f57cb6e0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mar 25, 2014 9:43 PM, wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:41:53 -0700, Dave Taht said: > > > I'm still at a loss as to the most correct way to bring up dnssec. > > Don't sweat it too much - nobody else in the security business knows > how to do it either. :) DNSSEC has even less uptake than IPv6.... Not for long I hope! --f46d043c80465e779104f57cb6e0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mar 25, 2014 9:43 PM, <Val= dis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:41:53 -0700, Dave Taht said:
>
> > I'm still at a loss as to the most correct way to bring up dn= ssec.
>
> Don't sweat it too much - nobody else in the security business kno= ws
> how to do it either. :) =A0DNSSEC has even less uptake than IPv6....

Not for long I hope!

--f46d043c80465e779104f57cb6e0--