From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
"dpreed@reed.com" <dpreed@reed.com>,
"cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: License File for Open Source Repositories
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:05:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6dDcD-GPEEw+YJSXSuurv++yoYsrTHiWo2k7D7xx63bg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67c64511-8b25-52a9-6132-40f5e6de593b@petit-huguenin.org>
My christmas wish: that this concurrence becomes a majority opinion.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20161005/15280135720/prominent-pro-patent-judge-issues-opinion-declaring-all-software-patents-bad.shtml
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin
<marc@petit-huguenin.org> wrote:
> On 12/23/2016 05:35 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 Dec, 2016, at 22:35, Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Aren't communication protocols mathematics, e.g. propositions in linear logic, and so unpatentable?
>>
>> I would agree with that assessment. Unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to stop patent offices from issuing such patents and courts from hearing cases brought on them.
>>
>
> Maybe one day they'll reject these kind of applications the same way they reject application for perpetual machines:
>
> http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PG01&Query=CCL%2F%2274%22%2FDIG.9
>
>> - Jonathan Morton
>>
>
>
> --
> Marc Petit-Huguenin
> Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
> Blog: https://marc.petit-huguenin.org
> Profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
>
--
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-24 2:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-23 19:44 dpreed
2016-12-23 20:17 ` Dave Taht
2016-12-23 20:35 ` Marc Petit-Huguenin
2016-12-24 1:35 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-12-24 2:01 ` Marc Petit-Huguenin
2016-12-24 2:05 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2016-12-24 20:21 ` Michael Richardson
[not found] <148250741312.16852.14743474459827703109.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
2016-12-23 16:05 ` Dave Taht
2016-12-23 19:23 ` Marc Petit-Huguenin
2016-12-24 19:21 ` Michael Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw6dDcD-GPEEw+YJSXSuurv++yoYsrTHiWo2k7D7xx63bg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=dpreed@reed.com \
--cc=marc@petit-huguenin.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox