From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02DC42007D0 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 08:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z2so653112wiv.7 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:40:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZBG+xzyj4Hj0pOyakFAHfTtASaUYrehrvZTgNvvJiig=; b=H0dC4e5pBiI7dfEwidK4s7SWJpUS1yvnwSR1B/8+CkoY4ckFvgBr4rBCGwEJKsTmMh s66yPwyre3K4T8xSRYADFDIVBKTF0kEsLVOLH4WE5+J9BiOPvehy1Y32+xpKSAf99O0b 80urcaqTaNeIRQRIgR1xUwoVjI0HJfOR/pcU5tn3j0Qvg3XCys36y45B7ykpm05EnF0T pxs2XUfYqjpepqAa6hj2ryGPfHc47SjGCccJRkF3EGjm2ki1Mg/K1nh2SNBnkHRazy3l szcrpndT+Q2Q9HtofWYKqDCYGonr9iUpzIMwZrHq6MyrKxbHw1kBq9sDcFXQPNdm3T9U LySg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.230 with SMTP id bz6mr2574704wib.17.1388767258438; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 08:40:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.123.69 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 08:40:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.123.69 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 08:40:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:40:58 -0500 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cb.list6" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be0081d712f04ef139333 Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] 6relayd X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:41:33 -0000 --f46d043be0081d712f04ef139333 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 At one level I am happy to figure out this is a recently introduced bug. On the other hand I am not sure if it is 6relayd. What version of cero was working for you? On Jan 3, 2014 12:21 AM, "cb.list6" wrote: > Hi, > > I have been using CeroWRT on Comcast with a 3800 for about 6 month. The > DHCP-PD config has always been a little unstable for me, but working. > > I recently upgraded to: > > root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a > Linux cerowrt 3.10.24 #1 Tue Dec 24 10:50:15 PST 2013 mips GNU/Linux > > My WAN gets a /128, but i cannot get DHCP-PD to work to get addresses on > the rest of my interfaces. The router does seem to have good IPv6 access. > > > I fiddled with the 6relayd config and came up with this, but it does not > work. Any pointers on how to get this back on track? The result of the > below config is that the /128 from the WAN interfaces is now present on all > the interfaces but my attached computers get no addresses. > > > config server 'default' > option rd 'server' > option dhcpv6 'server' > option management_level '1' > list network 'ge01' > list network 'gw00' > list network 'gw01' > list network 'gw10' > list network 'gw11' > list network 'se00' > list network 'sw00' > list network 'sw10' > option fallback_relay 'rd dhcpv6 ndp' > option master 'ge00' > > root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel > > --f46d043be0081d712f04ef139333 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

At one level I am happy to figure out this is a recently int= roduced bug.

On the other hand I am not sure if it is 6relayd.

What version of cero was working for you?

On Jan 3, 2014 12:21 AM, "cb.list6" &l= t;cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

I have been usin= g CeroWRT on=20 Comcast with a 3800 for about 6 month.=A0 The DHCP-PD config has always=20 been a little unstable for me, but working.

I recently upgrade= d to:

=A0root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a
Linux cerowrt 3.10.24 #1 Tue D= ec 24 10:50:15 PST 2013 mips GNU/Linux

My WAN gets a /128, but i cannot get DHCP-PD to work to get addresses on=20 the rest of my interfaces.=A0 The router does seem to have good IPv6=20 access.=A0


I fiddled with the 6relayd config and came up with=20 this, but it does not work.=A0 Any pointers on how to get this back on=20 track?=A0 The result of the below config is that the /128 from the WAN=20 interfaces is now present on all the interfaces but my attached=20 computers get no addresses.


config server 'default'
=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 option rd 'server'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 option = dhcpv6 'server'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 option management_level &#= 39;1'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network 'ge01'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network 'gw00'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = list network 'gw01'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network 'gw10= '
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network 'gw11'
=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0 list network 'se00'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network= 'sw00'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 list network 'sw10'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 = option fallback_relay 'rd dhcpv6 ndp'
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 opti= on master 'ge00'

root@cerowrt:/etc/config# uname -a

_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
Cerowrt-devel@lists.= bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel

--f46d043be0081d712f04ef139333--