Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net?

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

http://testmy.net/db/GJfVYlN.y6ptsBz - this is through a fq_codeled mesh network
with wifi on 3 of the hops, and an older version of the SQM system on
the gateway. Obviously am bottlenecked on the wifi.

I note from a browser perspective, doing a httpping equivalent during
the test would probably work quite well.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> If it did download + ping or upload + ping or download/upload + ping I
> would be happy.
>
> If it ran for long enough by default to detect speedboost AND show the
> result I'd be happier.
>
> That said, it's not worse than speedtest.
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello everyone! I was looking for a website better than speedtest.net and
>> well I think I may have found one and it is called testmy.net and what I
>> found is that you are able to change the server selection well to be able to
>> determine if you have routing issues or so. and also their test allows you
>> to customize how much megabyte to download or upload so the test runs for
>> over 10 seconds to better get a accurate estimate of your speeds. I have
>> used it and I got different results from using speedtest.net and testmy.net
>> and so I wanted to let ya about it to see if people could use that instead
>> of speedtest.net and thoughts?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html