[Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net?

[Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net?

[Ernesto Elias]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 628 bytes --]

Hello everyone! I was looking for a website better than speedtest.net and
well I think I may have found one and it is called testmy.net and what I
found is that you are able to change the server selection well to be able
to determine if you have routing issues or so. and also their test allows
you to customize how much megabyte to download or upload so the test runs
for over 10 seconds to better get a accurate estimate of your speeds. I
have used it and I got different results from using speedtest.net and
testmy.net and so I wanted to let ya about it to see if people could use
that instead of speedtest.net and thoughts?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 818 bytes --]

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net?

[Dave Taht]

If it did download + ping or upload + ping or download/upload + ping I
would be happy.

If it ran for long enough by default to detect speedboost AND show the
result I'd be happier.

That said, it's not worse than speedtest.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone! I was looking for a website better than speedtest.net and
> well I think I may have found one and it is called testmy.net and what I
> found is that you are able to change the server selection well to be able to
> determine if you have routing issues or so. and also their test allows you
> to customize how much megabyte to download or upload so the test runs for
> over 10 seconds to better get a accurate estimate of your speeds. I have
> used it and I got different results from using speedtest.net and testmy.net
> and so I wanted to let ya about it to see if people could use that instead
> of speedtest.net and thoughts?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net?

[Dave Taht]

http://testmy.net/db/GJfVYlN.y6ptsBz - this is through a fq_codeled mesh network
with wifi on 3 of the hops, and an older version of the SQM system on
the gateway. Obviously am bottlenecked on the wifi.

I note from a browser perspective, doing a httpping equivalent during
the test would probably work quite well.

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> If it did download + ping or upload + ping or download/upload + ping I
> would be happy.
>
> If it ran for long enough by default to detect speedboost AND show the
> result I'd be happier.
>
> That said, it's not worse than speedtest.
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello everyone! I was looking for a website better than speedtest.net and
>> well I think I may have found one and it is called testmy.net and what I
>> found is that you are able to change the server selection well to be able to
>> determine if you have routing issues or so. and also their test allows you
>> to customize how much megabyte to download or upload so the test runs for
>> over 10 seconds to better get a accurate estimate of your speeds. I have
>> used it and I got different results from using speedtest.net and testmy.net
>> and so I wanted to let ya about it to see if people could use that instead
>> of speedtest.net and thoughts?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
>
> Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html

Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net?

[Lucas Wan]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1027 bytes --]

I found that testmy.net seems to have insufficient bandwidth to handle the testing.  For my connection, testmy.net reports 20 Mbps, while speedtest 160 Mbps.  So I would not rely on what testmy.net says.
-----Original Message-----
From:    Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com>
To:      cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net?




Hello everyone! I was looking for a website better than speedtest.net and well I think I may have found one and it is called testmy.net and what I found is that you are able to change the server selection well to be able to determine if you have routing issues or so. and also their test allows you to customize how much megabyte to download or upload so the test runs for over 10 seconds to better get a accurate estimate of your speeds. I have used it and I got different results from using speedtest.net and testmy.net and so I wanted to let ya about it to see if people could use that instead of speedtest.net and thoughts? 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1959 bytes --]