From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCAE21F206 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hr14so289676wib.16 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:39:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dOLd1e2kyGXsPTzWCSRcDsZmVPgfIgTRFLy4TRyggbk=; b=S3nHom93bUh3WJHhKwKQ5UMhngelyqt5/WF/ryVq2el4CG+uMkwNABzWSAt1kNGR4x eIlx6mKM3bu4hn9ykjzWFg3YMcSPeTec1g1m+CV4FnFli4uN1dBYFG4fpsBHqhYSKnJH 4qzEhcryfsKNZxieZ/CwXmuedHKvWK4Rum46SxNa23tfwsoaVfbDyiRPSpuIeugMmpR6 etxOxtoSZB6dEXwrRn9Sq8ZYkYsZ40wOXfERGhG+6qhjDohY7b6RI5A7fKjS7GGA2QTt ONDDFlZo85muRizZxdn2rrKJk6ckUSzSFEIMexMmBGi08Q5Bc5ZGmZlxEA9o6vagd+pB 8G+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.37.178 with SMTP id z18mr10470259wij.46.1395592755983; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 09:39:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:39:15 +0000 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Ernesto Elias Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Better than speedtest.net? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 16:39:19 -0000 http://testmy.net/db/GJfVYlN.y6ptsBz - this is through a fq_codeled mesh ne= twork with wifi on 3 of the hops, and an older version of the SQM system on the gateway. Obviously am bottlenecked on the wifi. I note from a browser perspective, doing a httpping equivalent during the test would probably work quite well. On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > If it did download + ping or upload + ping or download/upload + ping I > would be happy. > > If it ran for long enough by default to detect speedboost AND show the > result I'd be happier. > > That said, it's not worse than speedtest. > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Ernesto Elias = wrote: >> Hello everyone! I was looking for a website better than speedtest.net an= d >> well I think I may have found one and it is called testmy.net and what I >> found is that you are able to change the server selection well to be abl= e to >> determine if you have routing issues or so. and also their test allows y= ou >> to customize how much megabyte to download or upload so the test runs fo= r >> over 10 seconds to better get a accurate estimate of your speeds. I have >> used it and I got different results from using speedtest.net and testmy.= net >> and so I wanted to let ya about it to see if people could use that inste= ad >> of speedtest.net and thoughts? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel >> > > > > -- > Dave T=E4ht > > Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscrib= e.html --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html