From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
Cc: Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com>,
cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SQM and PPPoE, more questions than answers...
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:01:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6jDGefAzsoGUhYwHUuVzU9yJMAaf1iDj4rYwZGRg0Ctg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87619x84w4.fsf@toke.dk>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> Alan Jenkins <alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I also notice that my test with eth1 (disabling classification) is the
>> only one where UDP ping (including UDP EF) is visible for any time at
>> all. (ok, pppoe-wan shows UDP BK, and it very clearly gets higher
>> latency as I would expect).
>
> FYI the svn version of netperf has a feature to restart the UDP
> measurement flows after a timeout. If you build that (don't forget the
> --enable-demo switch to ./configure) and stick it in your $PATH,
> netperf-wrapper should pick it up automatically and use the option. This
> might get you better results on the UDP flows...
I note that time of first loss is a valuable statistic in itself, and
I would like
to see it called out more on the measurement flows on the graph.
> -Toke
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
--
Dave Täht
Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-11 23:12 Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-15 0:03 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-15 12:02 ` Török Edwin
2014-10-15 13:39 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-15 17:28 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-15 19:55 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-18 22:14 ` Alan Jenkins
2015-03-19 2:43 ` David Lang
2015-03-19 3:11 ` Dave Taht
2015-03-19 8:37 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-19 8:29 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-19 9:42 ` Alan Jenkins
2015-03-19 9:58 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-03-19 13:49 ` Alan Jenkins
2015-03-19 13:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2015-03-19 14:01 ` Dave Taht [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw6jDGefAzsoGUhYwHUuVzU9yJMAaf1iDj4rYwZGRg0Ctg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=alan.christopher.jenkins@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox