From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB0621F2F8 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:01:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oifl3 with SMTP id l3so35311731oif.0 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:01:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1BhWAoDcLgQAnZzcUy8y0lSvJQFfkF6WYGoNNneLkRM=; b=QFJOPpJK+AjImvd4rXAZGoolKhnWStfQtZa+G04rZRmrdkqj/7ntxMVcRY5wIE8K9r GkK2uhPr/GlF8rRdkPI5fA27MsUG3hb+kingpH3a1R9bPr6fQwVB5Has9tg/Oehpe1I1 dVCr5d1/Uf2tCbUTH9LqTq9zNSe3i4tYNzwVdX8L8xp06TetHp50CZDnE9HQuze+fk0d AbQpXC/NWHr4+oowQcBuqCBmxXfTgDLUvIWciwFhxI9uSjODavJCRvRcDvoscfA1YC6G G9r8H62S5DqOLLPcQ2Y7E5mxJ5MU37aR9SoOD60kxyX185Ndk/0ZfgsxT3s6EWbQQCBj oBdw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.230.132 with SMTP id sy4mr62048242obc.29.1426773702872; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:01:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87619x84w4.fsf@toke.dk> References: <1895D16A-1B0F-48C7-B4B5-6FC84CA92F43@gmx.de> <5509F8B1.6090608@gmail.com> <550AD3F8.1000904@gmail.com> <87619x84w4.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 07:01:42 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Alan Jenkins , cerowrt-devel Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] SQM and PPPoE, more questions than answers... X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:02:15 -0000 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: > Alan Jenkins writes: > >> I also notice that my test with eth1 (disabling classification) is the >> only one where UDP ping (including UDP EF) is visible for any time at >> all. (ok, pppoe-wan shows UDP BK, and it very clearly gets higher >> latency as I would expect). > > FYI the svn version of netperf has a feature to restart the UDP > measurement flows after a timeout. If you build that (don't forget the > --enable-demo switch to ./configure) and stick it in your $PATH, > netperf-wrapper should pick it up automatically and use the option. This > might get you better results on the UDP flows... I note that time of first loss is a valuable statistic in itself, and I would like to see it called out more on the measurement flows on the graph. > -Toke > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb