From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B41521F16A for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n12so3820783wgh.0 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:39:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cBRRKBD6dyLPXtrloKBPf/ejYJAVzLGVFzKHu7t6E90=; b=C5Za87GdLgYzYi4FJG8P4HFvT/EorJsPAUGlrzubApVEbQ52bDBt6i/CNB3LnBmJ4l BfROgkgHvBCl4PUT8nATT8XUYM00lLgRgmufo/4Tfc/yQeKAYz/PCk1nrEK/wTWpZSZl l6horkVisWBEFdzSAkA19xyLWfMjB/vD4p0FToWFpHdh7mHK6ewkmnQ1FnpcRsAqcFr3 vfN8aCrsReg601LAmS5w4DIh2K1lzGzO6fHKrhypVvW/il9jvyKCsvqNwiOeJxl/JhNF dxguZ/mdFbdo3eR93Kc3kz3icY4rgNr+/yUki2duYhDY/Z66Or4xEr5hHfi4+2eCOIyY 45Dg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.81.164 with SMTP id b4mr487361wjy.2.1396035559243; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:39:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:39:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <30456.1396032043@sandelman.ca> References: <30456.1396032043@sandelman.ca> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:39:19 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Michael Richardson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Fwd: wndr3800 replacement X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 19:39:21 -0000 On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michael Richardson wro= te: > > Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > > I also think that it'll be very hard to find a box that is decently > > priced > > that also will do gig speeds *and* will do AQM, since most home > > gateways that > > So, I'm struggling to get a $700 Cisco (not Linksys) SOHO switch to forwa= rd > packets at GbE across my home LAN. Gigabit ethernet in the home is actu= ally > a reality.... and having a Gigabit LAN hit a 11Mb/s (half-duplex!) 802.11= b > wireless means that in many homes, we actually need a box that satisfies > both. > > My vote would be to double the price from $80 to $250, and set that as th= e > new base for cerowrt work. If it can't forward more than 2-3 GbE links, > that is just fine. I don't expect 24-ports of GbE. > (I was expecting that cisco switch to do that... sadly no lost packets > on a $100 unmanaged FE switch...) I started looking at the edgerouter LTE and related boxes again. Does anyone else have one? They have a new release based on 3.4 out; backporting fq_codel might work. I don't have any numbers on it's performance however, and it does look like updating it to 3.10 would be good idea. > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh netwo= rks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network archite= ct [ > ] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails= [ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html