From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] mdns reflector issues on ipv6/babel routing through nat.
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:24:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6nkxG62R6norzqVW8C_Db1iYv3304C9gO6355q8zOJaA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4SWCDgAwQ3xzBW65_ezgqrxt2k9yD7TALx2DuaTFcNxg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> Once you get to a few routers, a few deep, (3 in series in this case,
> 9 overall), the avahi mdns proxy starts to malfunction over ipv6, and
> I ended up with a rather nasty broadcast storm.
>
> So I had to disable the ipv6 multicast of mdns in order to get my
> network back in this (excessively) complex network.
>
> use-ipv6=no in the /etc/avahi/avahi-daemon file
>
> Seems to work fine, two deep. Curiously, I did not observe a similar
> storm for ipv4...
>
> Now this is across like 5 different versions of cerowrt, but it would
> not surprise me that this is a generic problem with avahi on ipv6,
> and/or a symptom of the brain-damaged-ness of mdns in the first place.
>
> use-ipv6=no
>
> I note that when you connect cero boxes together in a babel mesh
> configuration, site-local multicast is not a problem, because it
> doesn't work in the first place (by design). This can be construed as
> an advantage (no broadcast storm), or disadvantage (mdns and
> site-local multicast doesn't work across meshed links)
Actually I was wrong. I'm STILL observing a broadcast storm, AND it
is taking place across the meshed links too.... aggggh.....
> Incidentally, I don't know if anyone would purposely inflict a network
> this complex on themselves:
>
> http://pastebin.com/LzeeiCXg
>
> but it does illustrate that a complex, automagically routed, fault
> tolerant ipv4 and ipv6 network IS feasible, so long as all internal
> addresses are unique.
>
> The biggest problem I run into is that 'failover-capable,
> fault-tolerant routing' introduces major headaches with firewall
> rules.
>
> Another thing the above paste illustrates that you can mix and match
> ipv4 nat with ipv6 fully meshed routing.
>
> The box I took that trace off has babel enabled on all interfaces, and
> has the following rule at the top of it's babeld.conf file
>
> out if ge00 ip 0.0.0.0/0 deny
>
> (as do multiple other boxes in the lab on the external network)
>
> this prohibits announcing ipv4 routes across the natted ge00
> interface, but allows ipv6. In the caseof that paste, this particular
> router has NO internal wired connections at all, it just meshes
> internally for ipv4, and because ge00 is a higher quality (ethernet)
> interface, babel chooses it for the default for ipv6 for most routes.
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> SKYPE: davetaht
> US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
> http://www.bufferbloat.net
--
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://www.bufferbloat.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-18 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-18 21:22 Dave Taht
2012-03-18 21:24 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2012-03-18 21:27 ` Jim Gettys
2012-03-18 21:30 ` Dave Taht
2012-03-18 21:35 ` Dave Taht
2012-03-19 19:41 ` Robert Bradley
2012-03-19 22:07 ` Robert Bradley
2012-03-19 22:11 ` Dave Taht
2012-03-20 0:54 ` Robert Bradley
2012-03-26 11:48 ` Robert Bradley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw6nkxG62R6norzqVW8C_Db1iYv3304C9gO6355q8zOJaA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox