Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com>,
	cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Routing limit question
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:22:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6rJ78GoD-cEUP2m+z4mFuTM9PakRR9+D3BZNfCcXjBQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7B5DD5A3-D273-4708-909C-5B5D5DE72282@gmx.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2868 bytes --]

It looks to me as if the actiontec has pretty good qos all by itself.
On Oct 19, 2014 11:56 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:

> HI Dave,
>
>
> On Oct 19, 2014, at 20:24 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On at least one verizon device I've tried it appeared that they had
> > SFQ or something similar on egress from the modem.
> >
> >
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizon-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down
> >
> > So you only needed to shape the download. which is good as we start
> > peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only measurements can tell.
>
>         So on Hnymans community openwrt build a few fortunate ones on
> excellent lines seem to get decent results even at 110-120 Mbps combined:
> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=250989#p250989
> and:
> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=251013#p251013
> I have no idea why and both lines were reasonably well-behaved even
> without any AQM/QOS...
>
> Also I wonder whether when we increase the quantum for higher rates to
> give HTB some breathing room, whether we also should increase burst and
> cburst? My hunch is that quantum affects the switching between the leaves,
> while busts and cburst should allow to dump more data to lower layers
> inside each leaf qdisc. And since we are running behind, maybe taking a
> bigger shovel can help some. (I assume this needs to be titrated not to
> kill latency under load, but if we can only effective have HTB execute x
> times per second we can easily afford to dump
> line-rate/maxHTB_iteratin_rate bytes per opportunity, no?) My own internet
> link is way to slow to test this...
>
> Best Regards
>         Sebastian
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hello everyone!
> >> I have a question about the wndr3800 routing limit. I went back to the
> older
> >> submissions to see if I can find what would be the answer for it. But
> in my
> >> search I haven't managed to find a definite answer. From what I seen
> about
> >> setting the limit it can do with SQM is 50, 60, or 80 mbit. I'm just
> >> wondering if anyone can shed some light for me here as I have verizon
> fios
> >> and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you guys very much!
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dave Täht
> >
> > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4119 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-19 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-19 17:51 Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 18:24 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-19 18:48   ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 18:51     ` Dave Taht
2014-10-19 19:16       ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 19:55         ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-20  1:08           ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-20  8:11             ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-21  2:30               ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-21  8:23                 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-22 19:39                   ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-22 20:36                     ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-23 22:03                       ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-24 11:38                         ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-19 18:56   ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-19 19:22     ` Dave Taht [this message]
2014-10-19 19:33       ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 19:41         ` Dave Taht
     [not found]     ` <CAA93jw6DFxoDaRVCoQn=zxbOjgQ-dA1bCZ1W=p9br25jWrRgkg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-19 22:44       ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-20 20:04         ` Dave Taht
2014-10-20 22:48           ` Dave Taht
2014-10-21  3:35             ` Aaron Wood
2014-10-21  7:43               ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-21  7:51             ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw6rJ78GoD-cEUP2m+z4mFuTM9PakRR9+D3BZNfCcXjBQA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=ernestogelias@gmail.com \
    --cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox