From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com>,
cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Routing limit question
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 12:22:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6rJ78GoD-cEUP2m+z4mFuTM9PakRR9+D3BZNfCcXjBQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7B5DD5A3-D273-4708-909C-5B5D5DE72282@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2868 bytes --]
It looks to me as if the actiontec has pretty good qos all by itself.
On Oct 19, 2014 11:56 AM, "Sebastian Moeller" <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> HI Dave,
>
>
> On Oct 19, 2014, at 20:24 , Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On at least one verizon device I've tried it appeared that they had
> > SFQ or something similar on egress from the modem.
> >
> >
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizon-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down
> >
> > So you only needed to shape the download. which is good as we start
> > peaking out at 50Mbit download total. But only measurements can tell.
>
> So on Hnymans community openwrt build a few fortunate ones on
> excellent lines seem to get decent results even at 110-120 Mbps combined:
> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=250989#p250989
> and:
> https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=251013#p251013
> I have no idea why and both lines were reasonably well-behaved even
> without any AQM/QOS...
>
> Also I wonder whether when we increase the quantum for higher rates to
> give HTB some breathing room, whether we also should increase burst and
> cburst? My hunch is that quantum affects the switching between the leaves,
> while busts and cburst should allow to dump more data to lower layers
> inside each leaf qdisc. And since we are running behind, maybe taking a
> bigger shovel can help some. (I assume this needs to be titrated not to
> kill latency under load, but if we can only effective have HTB execute x
> times per second we can easily afford to dump
> line-rate/maxHTB_iteratin_rate bytes per opportunity, no?) My own internet
> link is way to slow to test this...
>
> Best Regards
> Sebastian
>
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Ernesto Elias <ernestogelias@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hello everyone!
> >> I have a question about the wndr3800 routing limit. I went back to the
> older
> >> submissions to see if I can find what would be the answer for it. But
> in my
> >> search I haven't managed to find a definite answer. From what I seen
> about
> >> setting the limit it can do with SQM is 50, 60, or 80 mbit. I'm just
> >> wondering if anyone can shed some light for me here as I have verizon
> fios
> >> and my speeds are 50 dl/50 ul. Thank you guys very much!
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> >> Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dave Täht
> >
> > thttp://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/bloat/wiki/Upcoming_Talks
> > _______________________________________________
> > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4119 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-19 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-19 17:51 Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 18:24 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-19 18:48 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 18:51 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-19 19:16 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 19:55 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-20 1:08 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-20 8:11 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-21 2:30 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-21 8:23 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-22 19:39 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-22 20:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-23 22:03 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-24 11:38 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-19 18:56 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-19 19:22 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2014-10-19 19:33 ` Ernesto Elias
2014-10-19 19:41 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CAA93jw6DFxoDaRVCoQn=zxbOjgQ-dA1bCZ1W=p9br25jWrRgkg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-10-19 22:44 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-20 20:04 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-20 22:48 ` Dave Taht
2014-10-21 3:35 ` Aaron Wood
2014-10-21 7:43 ` Sebastian Moeller
2014-10-21 7:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw6rJ78GoD-cEUP2m+z4mFuTM9PakRR9+D3BZNfCcXjBQA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ernestogelias@gmail.com \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox