From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220D421F14D for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:35:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by weyx43 with SMTP id x43so3205688wey.16 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:35:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1Yt+8x9/b6mHImSL36C8zvDEuziCyaek4dHCX+/kAII=; b=B7kP0ruuFtNi72Xxl+QGzfGJCIfs/8IJRQ6e6WviYboyv8O4ZxKVz7E+1xY4TaWrOP xzsDQ1+m42QvFKrYPaPgwBG6Gd45q3WIcKP8NsnrdNsMUbu5OSKjfuPfaAqvc4pjDSD9 Cs4k+zHiUNoZFwbnYey2biN2oitC7UtLF5WCl69Fx3baQE+2kZAyNuKtr1WaGsNy3e3K MV4DudyLW3CB1uGeYf3pK+9s63S2XucJVbWzN1YwJ0E4BY9k1vs3gZ34SE+/DKiH6CJ0 ul/7h8uloPy5KhCMgQs/W6iRGDGAQQBgPKXBzwvNdaaa3bMPg9ud37Lj8HT5PASaxiVS YxTw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.242.204 with SMTP id i54mr2927693wer.94.1348241713310; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:35:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.68.135 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:35:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <505B14A3.6050302@renta.net> References: <505AC149.2000905@googlemail.com> <505B14A3.6050302@renta.net> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 08:35:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Mark Constable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] understanding_cerowrt_buildsystem X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 15:35:15 -0000 Yes, getting cero (and openwrt) built right the first time is hard! As for issue tracking, I'm not fond of redmine's system (particularly as search on our implementation is busted and we have 100s of outstanding issues), but switching to github wholesale is not particularly palatable at first glance. I have kept hoping that something more compatable with me (something that interfaced to emacs and didn't require the web to do *anything*) would arise. My overall thought at the moment is to hold a "building openwrt/cerowrt google hangout" with as many participants as possible, get some your versions built, record the thing, see what barriers there are to making it easier, and smash them. This can certainly include trying to use github features harder. I do not currently maintain or use the build_cero script... I'm back in california now and migrating back to PDT, when would be a good time to get everyone together? Saturday? I note that I'm very free with commit access to the ceropackages repo in particular. If, in order to make forward progress on the dlna, upnp issues, we have to move those into ceropackages, go for it. The whole point of ceropackages was to try to find ways to quickly spin up and eventually push out, new, improved, interesting packages into openwrt mainline. Regardless pls send along your github ids, and I'll add you. On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Mark Constable wrote: > On 09/20/12 20:41, Maciej Soltysiak wrote: >> Also it makes it harder for Dave to delegate building to somebody else >> as he hinted last time. Could at least we make a list on the wiki of >> most common build problems and questions? > > Wouldn't it be better to use the issue tracker and pull requests at Githu= b? > > The whole point of Github is to make is easier for folks to cooperate and > accelerate project development and it has excellent tools for doing exact= ly > that, as long as the direction of the project allows for it and takes > advantage of the available social facilities. > > I'd like to get more involved too but it just seems all too hard atm so I > build stock AA OpenWrt uml images instead, for now, hoping I can get up t= o > speed with understanding the CeroWrt build process. > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki - "3.3.8-17 is out with fq_codel!"