From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ia0-x22c.google.com (mail-ia0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5811221F196 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 07:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l29so4854291iag.31 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 07:15:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WnBo8jHlfed0cN7Mn961rHJikmokAgleN4Gao2+ALxY=; b=l6yERVQPlDDHKN4DqTpYEwDFo9i4UbmEpz0IyiKQVQTUakGhogDMr9uQ9PWeKrdfOQ 61cj/VQUcw4aWq8sS09uGNUhU/PA1eTahtNMgQHUts8RI2nNWBk2WCECQQf+xWuD8oeZ SunQVg5ABWM2uPLZKgmBYw5D4bHh9/t8nNMBHd4wCOMLawEXptjP7d2A1f9TQH97jTaT sLtDvXb/WLW5G0EYIeMdfgWdy+0Ld2n50iqkqMI1u+D3VvYcpGO8FJxvSu+kPv9SVWV4 BiTUH+Taueyabbngf5NRSRdAlPaAeyEITqGwVO3nOq5HGBoRCSzMyeuKfZRXcOJ3LXpD Oe+A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.44.5 with SMTP id a5mr3343899igm.86.1364134517289; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 07:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.132.71 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 07:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 07:15:17 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, Simon Kelley , Steven Barth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] Hipnet was demoed at ietf X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 14:15:19 -0000 I had never heard of it before. It is a competing set of ideas to the cisco-driven homenet ideas, much simpler, there seems to be good stuff in here, notably combating the "directionless" problem. For those of you now deeply familiar with cerowrt, what of the below rfc draft makes sense and what doesn't? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-grundemann-homenet-hipnet-01 I assume there is reference code somewhere for what was shown at ietf? haven't looked. I'd assumed they were using the HIP protocol which is darn useful in scenarios like this, but that's not part of it, apparently. Also the bloat demo was videoed and blogged. I hope the video shows up soon on the ietf, as it was rather popular. http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/03/running-code-at-ietf-86-2/ --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html