Re: [Cerowrt-devel] trivial 6in4 fix(?)

[Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>]

simplest.qos would be less noisy. ;)

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
> Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I might be getting good at reading the patterns here - it looks like
>> this is fq_codel rather than nfq_codel?
>
> It is.

ns2_codel is "tighter"

>
>> #       target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/677-flow_dissector-Add-6in4-support-to-hash-keys.patch
>> #       target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/678-Handle-encapsulated-ipv6-better.patch
>> #       target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/678-remove-bad-timeout-logic-in-fast-recovery.patch
>
> Nope, those are not there.

Committed, pushed.

>> But a better test if you are using simplest.qos, rather than
>> simplest.qos, would be the 4BE test.

Well, that result is mildly puzzling. netperf-wrapper -6 throughout? no ipv4?

You are on a dsl line, too? There has been some fixes to the overhead
issue that have landed but encapsulation atm is still borked (you
using atm?)

>
> Right, attached rerun of rrul_noclassification.
>
> -Toke
>



-- 
Dave Täht

Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html