From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D60721F1B8 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e11so5298253iej.1 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:27:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BuNqE1BrJ/LvpNZbHy5UgVmJu/7KlIoSCrPbiYRNHLI=; b=s8viim5KakE+Rd4Xjw5xtSXshhbBOebc+u8bwGn8NlQD0NhMkVy6lULgW2AHnGzpX8 Aq3FzTRMSmNkXvo1ffJmasEEhnQqXj9P+gXh9lZnEOgQhGru0i6oAh5rQKo2deqmK6HT 6JIRWA/CRHhg0YeFidB2uqbVmtGRSzyFIyFrcAumlaSFi112iRoEtWTPUeJorx50FjK/ 7GGqAm2DVXABrwleTMVZwolKvf8cTGZU2DdHEl/W57pZGMfNIgP19shFdiPsHiS0idMk b8E2I5Gw3ngMklQ35PDrl77n2F54Li3TY//8THJjLoLbMotQm5znIjJ8vmIQMi/ht5Ct YwUg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.36.100 with SMTP id p4mr3394855igj.30.1371410836951; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:27:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.45.137 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:27:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87vc5drhdj.fsf@toke.dk> References: <8738shsx3w.fsf@toke.dk> <87vc5drhdj.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:27:16 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Toke_H=F8iland=2DJ=F8rgensen?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] trivial 6in4 fix(?) X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:27:17 -0000 simplest.qos would be less noisy. ;) On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Toke H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen = wrote: > Dave Taht writes: > >> I might be getting good at reading the patterns here - it looks like >> this is fq_codel rather than nfq_codel? > > It is. ns2_codel is "tighter" > >> # target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/677-flow_dissector-Add-6in4-sup= port-to-hash-keys.patch >> # target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/678-Handle-encapsulated-ipv6-be= tter.patch >> # target/linux/generic/patches-3.8/678-remove-bad-timeout-logic-in= -fast-recovery.patch > > Nope, those are not there. Committed, pushed. >> But a better test if you are using simplest.qos, rather than >> simplest.qos, would be the 4BE test. Well, that result is mildly puzzling. netperf-wrapper -6 throughout? no ipv= 4? You are on a dsl line, too? There has been some fixes to the overhead issue that have landed but encapsulation atm is still borked (you using atm?) > > Right, attached rerun of rrul_noclassification. > > -Toke > --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html