From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F3C421F184 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 22:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id h11so1603735wiv.0 for ; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 22:23:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GCP2R35ODLPGijnVLCrrX0MokLKU14Xq150593H+MKY=; b=gHaJwOPf73vd1AnSyaVceOJIWDElWyl2rpr3J+6orfJox1vs1U7STx231ObX7+90pR 4o83XBuIYjfP9HXlUDgQZ7PvHkpHpSImw/K6nMprdo/ThgA+LyC26/u6J5voeIuYWXIf k2Rx1fJ560PEGbGDrX88cPw1lDzNmZXzDNOd1TWgmGhl3yaQ2UA04fWrU7isel7WFhef BsU4p+pVAScmMnnu1usEingTERy/qID4mgnqvVdBBP5PNsKjg9KKRB69KJ4WZ2k0NcGL O9VIiBZiNsiSjaOT11e/52SGqdwC4p/b+Sp9bMlnzLm4BPUm+40CWq5OJUH2L/t9rcaa wEtg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.89.206 with SMTP id bq14mr13040089wib.56.1381728191000; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 22:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.67.202 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 22:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 22:23:10 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Cerowrt-devel] 3.10.15-5 released X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 05:23:13 -0000 totally untested. I will be back in front of a router in the yurtlab monday morning PDT. + resync with openwrt - revert back to dnsmasq 2.66 (openwrt head) Judging from the conversation it sounds like the dnsmasq bug may well not be the latest dnsmasq at all! but a modern openwrt not interacting with the multiple devices correctly. So I've reverted dnsmasq to openwrt head to test that assumption... ... in the morning. Unless someone beats me to it. http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~cero2/cerowrt/wndr/3.10.15-5/ --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html