From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f171.google.com (mail-we0-f171.google.com [74.125.82.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC8FD2008E8 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wejx9 with SMTP id x9so9151011wej.16 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:05:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0Yt6ikUURSu45h4F+eklR9+owMosm2z5fi8Vq7cUKjE=; b=JFn0xxQ+dmb0GRARGgTUZ4MoiunDBDs2SWcGP1I9GxgzWlnmbCluZ6A+ryOuafBar+ pzpmEDLS2jtsMjuQlcTzsqJScLKz0z/DkFVdWClkDGmBHNC7OZDto2pig/HTKXsHLB/t cu+Uy8IwNJDiop8hf4lHgRQ4moFa6Xu3nQ1XEnVHfZ3u3YNjuNGF1SYQF/VoJhiNkU22 H7YvFUm86cbG/Wlgw9Iup3ZWKaRYtti/Pvf3YKQQKd4qQJaBdI25KyWh7fK2EL5pHo51 J8eNQvp1w9K9BuBDi3fp3isA9IR0k7gJaTC3lZOknThoa+u0lv8BDzWpfq8IHx8cKY72 VR+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.82.198 with SMTP id k6mr4542756wiy.20.1340121917225; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.103.199 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:05:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <474BFD88-DA09-4D74-99AE-19E2AFDE705B@intermapper.com> References: <474BFD88-DA09-4D74-99AE-19E2AFDE705B@intermapper.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:05:17 -0400 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Richard Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Still trouble with 6in4 tunnel X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:05:20 -0000 I note full 6rd support for all sorts of netmasks just landed in openwrt (and I'll have it in cerowrt-3.3.8-6), and that apparently it works on AT&T's network as well as things like free.fr. 6to4 support has also been improved... As for the issue with multiple ipv6 interfaces, I'm away from the bloatlab#1 and between releases of cerowrt so I don't think I'll be able to get to it until cero stablizes again next week. I am trying to get a "bloatlab #2" up on comcast in particular somehow, using openwrt in part and cerowrt in others - basically eventually entirely replacing the local wifi network where I'm living in california - but am bottlenecked on funds for the needed hardware (need 6 ubiquity nanostation 5Ms and a 3-5 radios with omnis in addition to 3 3800s) and of course, time/energy/food money. Goal in life on this setup is to 0) Get ipv6 working well 1) get some real-life data on how all the work done so far works in real li= fe This includes things like getting constant monitoring done via dartware= (:)) 2) prototype the eventual wireless fixes to the mac80211 layer. FQ_codel is actually doing a surprisingly good job with the current hacks on top of wifi, but we think we can do much better, although the work looks to take 6-9 months with the all volunteer effort.... 3) Test out some of the new mesh networking code - authenticated routing has landed in quagga! woo-hoo! This is just one project proposal among many I'm dealing with, it really comes down to what project shows up with funding first. I happen to be motivated to do it because the network where I am is terrible - and actually based on hardware designed and deployed almost 10 years ago based on recommendations in my/greg's old arlan wireless howto! - so I'm willing to fix it for everyone in this complex just to get it *right* for me, and gain some more operational experience..... and lastly the hw budget is under 1.5k for the basic gear... On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Richard Brown wrote: > Dave, > > On Jun 10, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Richard Brown = wrote: > >> I have been working off and on to get IPv6 addressing working on multipl= e interfaces on CeroWrt 3.3.6-2. I can make it work on any single interface= , but not two at once >> ... > > As I noted in the earlier message (10 June), I'm on the air with IPv6 on = a single interface, which is sufficient for my testing purposes. > > Any chance that you'll get a chance to look at this? (I'm out of town fro= m this weekend for two weeks, so I won't be looking after that...) > > Thanks for all your good work! > > Rich Brown > Hanover, NH USA > _______________________________________________ > Cerowrt-devel mailing list > Cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht http://ronsravings.blogspot.com/