Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: "Joel Wirāmu Pauling" <joel@aenertia.net>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
	cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] KASLR: Do we have to worry about other arches than x86?
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2018 13:47:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6zfRtp7vaUm6aufTQtk7=LAFJ2C7PdKhLitmHSwAs=Kw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKiAkGRAwNtBGs8rs-8NWgFGZfr2zAzyf8A9Sv6sQGWoQ+j20w@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling <joel@aenertia.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 5 January 2018 at 01:09, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I don't think we need to worry about it too much in a router context.
>> Virtual server folks, OTOH...
>>
>>  - Jonathan Morton
>>
> Disagree - The Router is pretty much synonymous with NFV
>
> ; I run my lede instances at home on hypervisors - and this is definitely
> the norm in Datacentres now. We need to work through this quite carefully.

Yes, the NFV case is serious and what I concluded we had most to worry
about - before starting to worry about the lower end router chips
themselves. But I wasn't aware that people were actually trying to run
lede in that, I'd kind of expected
a more server-like distro to be used there. Why lede in a NFV? Ease of
configuration? Reduced attack surface? (hah)

The only x86 chip I use (aside from simulations) is the AMD one in the
apu2, which I don't know enough about as per speculation...

-- 

Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-04 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-01 23:08 Dave Taht
     [not found] ` <CAJq5cE23bbiPE0a_9zd1VLnO7=c7bjmwwxVwaD2=to3fg5TOjA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-01-01 23:27   ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-02 19:06 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 12:09   ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 13:38     ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 13:48       ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 13:59         ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 14:49           ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 14:53             ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 20:28               ` dpreed
2018-01-04 21:20                 ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 21:40                 ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 21:51                   ` valdis.kletnieks
2018-01-04 21:44     ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-01-04 21:47       ` Dave Taht [this message]
2018-01-04 21:52         ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-01-04 21:54           ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 21:57             ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
     [not found]           ` <1515103187.670416570@apps.rackspace.com>
2018-01-04 22:02             ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
     [not found]       ` <1515103048.715224709@apps.rackspace.com>
2018-01-04 22:00         ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-01-04 22:09           ` dpreed
2018-01-04 22:13             ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-01-04 22:15             ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 22:26             ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-04 22:35               ` Joel Wirāmu Pauling
2018-01-04 22:58                 ` [Cerowrt-devel] Spectre and EBPF JIT dpreed
2018-01-05  4:53                   ` Dave Taht
2018-01-05 14:07                     ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-05 15:35                       ` dpreed
2018-01-05 19:18                         ` Jonathan Morton
2018-01-05 20:15                           ` David Lang
2018-01-04 22:02 [Cerowrt-devel] KASLR: Do we have to worry about other arches than x86? dpreed
2018-01-04 22:02 dpreed
2018-01-04 22:04 ` Dave Taht
2018-01-04 22:12   ` dpreed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/cerowrt-devel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw6zfRtp7vaUm6aufTQtk7=LAFJ2C7PdKhLitmHSwAs=Kw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@aenertia.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox