From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65ED221F144 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id cc10so4521327wib.10 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:25:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Gd8rFLsl+6YN0AngtIbb1rP7FvacG1EtMnY0irugZw=; b=naxHGK3Jo8R3g2vuejUXh1bCmGIEyH0zWe21NRf3s/W8cB1L1+BfZvifXIa2S0d56Y xajvZlXz14KdcdopBadyI2hX7Wot83lkZbAfV05wdQqI1I2t4p25/UtCm3EPGGQq0A13 W++O8ws6gOBwcKIioeGly7oe/Wst+NXgH+O2yToz8hh+ZG9YH52/39+ZwBc7MSh2cX2S VTpcx58XdsmaStrCi+NNEO7Lfy9UxF9mjAEbbxnNp1FPSHz+UqyciW3Rgkp4o/HuMXz1 Jfa2jGxiUIISmeka5DcdOMOnIlAnicputmcO086z1jtZrvOpX3BKPDvXFv1SKW3Eijwx iDuw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.189.169 with SMTP id gj9mr17454610wic.17.1395199515372; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.8.1 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:25:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 20:25:15 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: "David P. Reed" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] more and more microscopic x86 hardware X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:25:17 -0000 On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 8:10 PM, David P. Reed wrote: > Is there a good usb 3.0 802.11 adapter? None that I know of (yet). However, there are plenty of pretty good half length dual band ath9k mini-pcie cards which would fit in a board like this. So that yields a box that can run SQM at a couple hundred mbit (hopefully), and drive an AP pretty hard. (I am looking for something that can fit a full length ath10k minipcie card= , which is mostly why I keep looking for something that can push gigE) there are a raft of boards like this coming out this spring, quite a few rated for extended temperature ranges, using the amd g series processors and/or intel bay trail. Some of these even have an open bios, although none I've found have 16MB of flash set aside for it. (linuxgizmos.com is good reading) I started building x86_64 versions of cero a while back with no real target as yet. (virtual machine? nuc? toke's box? my old atoms?) Amusingly the squashfs version of the x86_64 code weighs in at 14MB vs the mips 8MB. > > > On Mar 18, 2014, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> If this had a full length mini-pcie slot it would be a pretty good >> candidate for a higher end cero platform. >> >> http://linuxgizmos.com/pico-itx-board-runs-linux-on-amd-g-series-soc/ > > > -- Sent from my Android device with K-@ Mail. Please excuse my brevity. --=20 Dave T=E4ht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.= html