From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x22e.google.com (mail-ob0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE6FB21F33E; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:34:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbgh1 with SMTP id gh1so150623026obb.1; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:34:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xLfgfQ3G1TnT7TQ05QIrO+fNikxKAkCWs5+Pjz7HK5s=; b=dVH0zFHruxNAKXsbfm5fG2dYWizy5AIxEOkhX4L72vwOjDHpcPzdOsrtWUCfnNr8vZ rDZ41FLhNHAXE1OEZEP9eDdTnoGPnexUltCTGNUCmSu3AvVzi205oTAeyf5lZvE7iMFu IiLi4XOv2imJa/xsBq8vkaBF9yqWZqfz2kHMng4CkuKgV/00H/+T2yQnq4N/a28P27GG OXZEtinqnfX5D1vQCXED1rSzbrVNBYJTUXv9G90OXP1EkTsmOIMFL2gWMj5DhPl6RFCy 5Wpi1TRe4BqoPHdHpptiJO5pROuR2wTAEZltT2SUB0I3Y+6tCrp0ICtmuih5JSesDtzc e/QA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.66.106 with SMTP id e10mr34578492obt.42.1428528893749; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 14:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:34:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <81246.1428527679@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <81246.1428527679@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 14:34:53 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Valdis Kletnieks Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: cerowrt-devel , bloat Subject: Re: [Cerowrt-devel] Suggestions/advice for captive portal on gw00/gw10? X-BeenThere: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Development issues regarding the cerowrt test router project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 21:35:23 -0000 On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:14 PM, wrote: > On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:40:10 -0400, leetminiwheat said: > >> Sorry again, I found connlimit in iptables-mod-conntrack-extra. I'll >> investigate further about a simple portal and not make it too intrusive, >> just more of a warning that they're not on their (faster) home WiFi. > > It's 74F and sunny outside, it's one of the more scenic areas in southwes= t > Virginia, I have a Jaguar with an almost full tank of gas in the parking = lot, > and I'm stuck in this cubicle for a bit longer. So the snark is running = high > at the moment. > > http://www.ex-parrot.com/pete/upside-down-ternet.html > > And add an exception list for device MAC addresses you recognize.... > > That should do the trick. :) While amusing, that was not my point. My overall point is that not sharing wifi spectrum sanely, and the resulting interference is hurting everyone. There is no "theft" of internet access you are not using. (Admittedly there are (today) increasing amounts of usage caps from the ISP, which I do not like either.) --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht We CAN make better hardware, ourselves, beat bufferbloat, and take back control of the edge of the internet! If we work together, on making it: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/onetswitch/onetswitch-open-source-hard= ware-for-networking